Literature DB >> 7359503

A comparison of pregnancy experience in DES-exposed and DES-unexposed daughters.

A L Herbst, M M Hubby, R R Blough, F Azizi.   

Abstract

Reproductive histories were compared for 226 DES-exposed and 203 -unexposed daughters whose mothers participated in a double-blind evaluation 27 years before. Irregular menstruation was slightly more common among the exposed (10%) than among the unexposed (4%). Nineteen of the exposed and only four of the unexposed had primary infertility. Among those at risk, 86% of the unexposed and 67% of the exposed had become pregnant. The reasons for these differences are not known. Comparison of evaluable first pregnancy outcome revealed full-term live birth to be more common among the unexposed (85%) than the exposed (47%). Premature live birth was experienced by 22% of the exposed but only 7% of the unexposed. Nonviable outcomes of stillbirth, neonatal death, miscarriage and ectopic pregnancy occurred in 31% of the exposed and 8% of the unexposed. The difference in pregnancy outcomes between the groups is highly significant. The DES-exposed with transverse cervicovaginal ridges were more likely to experience a nonviable outcome. Overall 82% of the exposed and 93% of the unexposed had at least one live offspring.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Age Factors; Americas; Biology; Comparative Studies; Demographic Factors; Developed Countries; Diethylstilbestrol; Diseases; Endocrine System; Estrogens; Hormones; Marital Status; Maternal Age; North America; Northern America; Nuptiality; Parental Age; Physiology; Population; Population Characteristics; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications; Research Methodology; Studies; United States

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7359503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Reprod Med        ISSN: 0024-7758            Impact factor:   0.142


  7 in total

Review 1.  Determinants of low birth weight: methodological assessment and meta-analysis.

Authors:  M S Kramer
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 9.408

2.  Diethylstilbestrol in pregnancy: an update.

Authors:  R A Kinch
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1982-11-01       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  The association of maternal factors with delayed implantation and the initial rise of urinary human chorionic gonadotrophin.

Authors:  A M Z Jukic; C R Weinberg; D D Baird; A J Wilcox
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Paraovarian cysts associated with prenatal diethylstilbestrol exposure. Comparison of the human with a mouse model.

Authors:  A F Haney; R R Newbold; B F Fetter; J A McLachlan
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 4.307

5.  Single-cell sequencing of neonatal uterus reveals an Misr2+ endometrial progenitor indispensable for fertility.

Authors:  Hatice Duygu Saatcioglu; Motohiro Kano; Heiko Horn; Lihua Zhang; Wesley Samore; Nicholas Nagykery; Marie-Charlotte Meinsohn; Minsuk Hyun; Rana Suliman; Joy Poulo; Jennifer Hsu; Caitlin Sacha; Dan Wang; Guangping Gao; Kasper Lage; Esther Oliva; Mary E Morris Sabatini; Patricia K Donahoe; David Pépin
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 6.  Oestrogen supplementation, mainly diethylstilbestrol, for preventing miscarriages and other adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Authors:  A A Bamigboye; J Morris
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2003

7.  The estrogen-injected female mouse: new insight into the etiology of PCOS.

Authors:  John C Chapman; Soo Hong Min; Steven M Freeh; Sandra D Michael
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2009-05-18       Impact factor: 5.211

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.