Literature DB >> 7358917

The interaction of whole body vibration and impulse noise.

R P Hamernik, D Henderson, D Coling, N Slepecky.   

Abstract

Three groups of chinchillas, each consisting of five monaural animals, were exposed to one of three conditions: 1 h of sinusoidal, 30-Hz vibration at 1 g rms; 50 noise impulses at 155 dB, 1.5-m A duration, at the rate of 1/min; or a combination of the vibration and the impulse noise. Before exposure, and at various times after exposure, each animal's auditory evoked responses (AER) were measured at seven frequencies between 0.5 and 8.0 kHz. Thirty days after the exposure all animals were sacrificed for cochlear surface preparation histology. Chinchillas exposed to the vibration alone showed no significant temporary or permanent change in AER thresholds. The group exposed to impulse noise showed a maximum median TTS of from 34 dB at 0.5 kHz to 72 dB at 2 kHz and a flat PTS of 15-20 dB between 1 and 2.8 kHz. The combination group at all test times and frequencies showed a greater TTS and PTS than did the groups exposed to noise or vibration alone. The cochleograms are related in a variety of ways with hearing thresholds. The data from all three groups of experimental animals are consistent and demonstrate a potentiating effect of vibration on an impulse noise exposure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7358917     DOI: 10.1121/1.383942

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  9 in total

1.  Experimental vibratory damage of the inner ear.

Authors:  Marek Bochnia; Konrad Morgenroth; Wojciech Dziewiszek; Jerzy Kassner
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2004-06-18       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Effects of whole body vibration on outer hair cells' hearing response to distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Seyyed-Ali Moussavi-Najarkola; Ali Khavanin; Ramazan Mirzaei; Mojdeh Salehnia; Mehdi Akbari
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 2.416

3.  Changes in auditory evoked brain potentials during ultra-low frequency whole-body vibration of man or of his visual surround.

Authors:  H Seidel; U Schuster; G Menzel; N Nikolajewitsch Kurerov; J Richter; E J Schajpak; R Blüthner; A Meister; P Ullsperger
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1990

4.  Lower level noise exposure that produces only TTS modulates the immune homeostasis of cochlear macrophages.

Authors:  Mitchell D Frye; Celia Zhang; Bo Hua Hu
Journal:  J Neuroimmunol       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 3.478

5.  Ultrastructural changes to the cochlea resulting from impulse noise.

Authors:  N Slepecky; R Hamernik; D Henderson; D Coling
Journal:  Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1981

6.  Sensory-neural hearing loss during combined noise and vibration exposure. An analysis of risk factors.

Authors:  I Pyykkö; J Pekkarinen; J Starck
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.015

7.  Assessment of the influence of whole body vibration on Cochlear function.

Authors:  Seyyed-Ali Moussavi-Najarkola; Ali Khavanin; Ramazan Mirzaei; Mojdeh Salehnia; Mehdi Akbari
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 2.646

8.  Cochlear damages caused by vibration exposure.

Authors:  Seyyed Ali Moussavi Najarkola; Ali Khavanin; Ramazan Mirzaei; Mojdeh Salehnia; Ahad Muhammadnejad
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 0.611

9.  The chinchilla animal model for hearing science and noise-induced hearing loss.

Authors:  Monica Trevino; Edward Lobarinas; Amanda C Maulden; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.840

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.