Literature DB >> 7357616

Mammalian cell cycles need two random transitions.

R F Brooks, D C Bennett, J A Smith.   

Abstract

Although a single transition in the cell cycle is both sufficient and necessary to account for the distribution of differences in the intermitotic times of sister cells, two random transitions seem necessary to account for the responses of quiescent cells to stimulation by growth factors. We propose that serum-depleted quiescent cells "rest" in an indeterminate state (Q) which they leave at random upon stimulation and initiate a lengthy process (L). Upon completion of L the cells enter another indeterminate state (A) which they also leave at random and shortly thereafter initiate S phase and subsequently divide. On leaving A they also re-enter Q, and, again at random, initiate L. This sequence, Q leads to L leads to A, is maintained in steady state proliferation, and because of the random exit from Q and A, overlaps to varying degrees with the conventional cell cycle (M-G1-S-G2-M). The hypothesis provides a qualitative account of various problematic features of the lag between stimulation and entry into S phase. It also provides a good quantitative account of the distribution of sibling differences, the correlation coefficient of sibling intermitotic times and the distribution of intermitotic times and the distribution of intermitotic times in steady state growing cultures. There are striking similarities between the hypothetical cycle and the centriole cycle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7357616     DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674(80)90524-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell        ISSN: 0092-8674            Impact factor:   41.582


  31 in total

1.  An automaton model for the cell cycle.

Authors:  Atilla Altinok; Didier Gonze; Francis Lévi; Albert Goldbeter
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 3.906

2.  A deterministic model of the cell cycle.

Authors:  J Grasman
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.758

Review 3.  Collective behavior in gene regulation: the cell is an oscillator, the cell cycle a developmental process.

Authors:  Robert R Klevecz; Caroline M Li; Ian Marcus; Paul H Frankel
Journal:  FEBS J       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 5.542

Review 4.  Network calisthenics: control of E2F dynamics in cell cycle entry.

Authors:  Jeffrey V Wong; Peng Dong; Joseph R Nevins; Bernard Mathey-Prevot; Lingchong You
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 4.534

5.  Multiple cell and population-level interactions with mouse embryonic stem cell heterogeneity.

Authors:  Danielle Cannon; Adam M Corrigan; Agnes Miermont; Patrick McDonel; Jonathan R Chubb
Journal:  Development       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 6.868

Review 6.  Modelling mammalian cellular quiescence.

Authors:  Guang Yao
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 3.906

7.  Stretched cell cycle model for proliferating lymphocytes.

Authors:  Mark R Dowling; Andrey Kan; Susanne Heinzel; Jie H S Zhou; Julia M Marchingo; Cameron J Wellard; John F Markham; Philip D Hodgkin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Normal versus abnormal cell proliferation. A unitary and analytical overview.

Authors:  C Nicolini
Journal:  Cell Biophys       Date:  1980-12

9.  Interpreting CFSE obtained division histories of B cells in vitro with Smith-Martin and cyton type models.

Authors:  Ha Youn Lee; Edwin Hawkins; Martin S Zand; Tim Mosmann; Hulin Wu; Philip D Hodgkin; Alan S Perelson
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2009-04-21       Impact factor: 1.758

10.  Frequency-modulated pulses of ERK activity transmit quantitative proliferation signals.

Authors:  John G Albeck; Gordon B Mills; Joan S Brugge
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 17.970

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.