Literature DB >> 7357006

Nucleosome repeat lengths in the definitive erythroid series of the adult chicken.

R A Schlegel, K R Haye, A H Litwack, B M Phelps.   

Abstract

Morris [1] has suggested that the difference in nucleosome repeat length between chicken liver (200 base pairs) and mature chicken erythrocytes (212 base pairs) may be due to the presence of histone H5 which is found in chicken erythroid cells but not in other tissues. Levels of H5 increase during erythroid maturation in the adult chicken. To determine what influence H5 might have on repeat length, erythroid populations at various stages of maturation were isolated, and repeat lengths and levels of H5 were determined. Bone marrow cells from anemic chickens were cultured in vitro to permit non-cycling erythroblasts to mature and thus increase in density. Less dense cycling basophilic erythroblasts were then isolated by buoyant density centrifugation. This erythroblasts were then isolated by buoyant density centrifugation. This population has a repeat length of 205 base pairs and an H5 content roughly two-thirds that of mature erythrocytes, which have a repeat length of 212 base pairs. A population intermediate in maturation, consisting of cells of the anemic pheripheral blood, has a repeat length of 218 base pairs, and the predominant cell type in this population has an H5 content greater than that of mature erythrocytes. Therefore, changes in histone H5 content are reflected by the nucleosome repeat length during erythroid maturation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7357006     DOI: 10.1016/0005-2787(80)90041-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta        ISSN: 0006-3002


  9 in total

1.  Nucleosome repeat lengths do not change during in vitro differentiation of erythroleukemia cells.

Authors:  R A Schlegel; A H Litwack; B M Phelps
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  1980-07-31       Impact factor: 2.316

2.  Developmental changes in chromatin organization in rat cerebral hemisphere neurons and analysis of DNA reassociation kinetics.

Authors:  P D Greenwood; J J Heikkila; I R Brown
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 3.996

3.  Protection of discrete DNA fragments by the complex H1-octamerhistones or H5-octamerhistones after micrococcal nuclease digestion.

Authors:  S Muyldermans; I Lasters; L Wyns; R Hamers
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1981-08-11       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Organizational changes in chromatin at different malignant stages of Friend erythroleukemia.

Authors:  K E Leonardson; S B Levy
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1980-11-25       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Alterations in chromatin structure during early sea urchin embryogenesis.

Authors:  A Savić; P Richman; P Williamson; D Poccia
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Replacement of histone H1 by H5 in vivo does not change the nucleosome repeat length of chromatin but increases its stability.

Authors:  J M Sun; Z Ali; R Lurz; A Ruiz-Carrillo
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 11.598

7.  Determinants of nucleosome organization in primary human cells.

Authors:  Anton Valouev; Steven M Johnson; Scott D Boyd; Cheryl L Smith; Andrew Z Fire; Arend Sidow
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-05-22       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  The chromatin repeat length of brain cortex and cerebellar neurons changes concomitant with terminal differentiation.

Authors:  A W Jaeger; C C Kuenzle
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 11.598

9.  Divergent Residues Within Histone H3 Dictate a Unique Chromatin Structure in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Kristina L McBurney; Andrew Leung; Jennifer K Choi; Benjamin J E Martin; Nicholas A T Irwin; Till Bartke; Christopher J Nelson; LeAnn J Howe
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 4.562

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.