Literature DB >> 7356976

The orientation of the substrate sites of formate dehydrogenase and fumarate reductase in the membrane of Vibrio succinogenes.

A Kröger, E Dorrer, E Winkler.   

Abstract

Formate dehydrogenase and fumarate reductase are involved in the electron transport phosphorylation system of Vibrio succinogenes. The orientation of the active sites of these enzymes in the cytoplasmic membrane of the bacterium was investigated with the aim of elucidating the mechanism of energy transduction. This was done by measuring the accessiblities of the enzymes to substrates, dyes and inhibitors both in cells and in cell-derived particles obtained with the French press. 1. After treatment of the cells with lysozyme and EDTA, followed by fractionation, both enzymes were found exclusively in the membranous fractions, while the periplasmic as well as the cytoplasmic fractions were devoid of both of the enzymic activities. 2. The sites of dye interaction of fumarate reductase were inaccessible to non-permeant dyes in cells, but were fully accessible in French-press particles. The Km for succinate as measured with the permeant methylene blue as acceptor was increased ten fold on lysis of the cells. The Km measured in the particles was similar to that of lysed cells and was not altered by lysis. 3. The rates of formate oxidation in the presence of non-permeant dyes and the Km for formate were unaffected by cell lysis. On lysis of French-press particles, formate oxidation with both permeant and non-permeant acceptors was increased about three fold. The extent of stimulation was not altered by inhibition of the enzymic activities. 4. Succinate oxidation by particles was fully inhibited by 4-chloromercuriphenyl sulfonate whereas that of cells was fully resistant. Formate dehydrogenase in cells was inhibited by 4-diazophenyl sulfonate when added together with formate. This compound also inhibited the enzyme in the particles when given in the absence of a lytic agent or after its addition. However, most of the enzyme remained active if the inhibitor was added before the lytic agent. 5. Fumarate and succinate were actively taken up by the cells from the medium, while formate did not even penetrate through the membrane of the bacteria. 6. It is concluded that the substrate and the dye-reactive sites of formate dehydrogenase face the outside, while those of fumarate reductase face the inside of the cytoplasmic membrane of cells of V. succinogenes. About 70% of the French-press particles were inverted with respect to the substrate and dye sites of the enzymes. The membrane is impermeable to formate and does not contain a specific transporter. The electrogenic liberation of protons on the outisde and the uptake of protons from the cytoplasm of the bacteria, which accompany electron transport, can be explained on the basis of the orientation of the substrate sites of the enzymes without net transport of protons across the membrane.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7356976     DOI: 10.1016/0005-2728(80)90136-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta        ISSN: 0006-3002


  20 in total

1.  Cloning and nucleotide sequence of the structural genes encoding the formate dehydrogenase of Wolinella succinogenes.

Authors:  M Bokranz; M Gutmann; C Körtner; E Kojro; F Fahrenholz; F Lauterbach; A Kröger
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.552

2.  Heterologous production in Wolinella succinogenes and characterization of the quinol:fumarate reductase enzymes from Helicobacter pylori and Campylobacter jejuni.

Authors:  Mauro Mileni; Fraser MacMillan; Christos Tziatzios; Klaus Zwicker; Alexander H Haas; Werner Mäntele; Jörg Simon; C Roy D Lancaster
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2006-04-01       Impact factor: 3.857

3.  Localization of hydrogenase and nitrate reductase in Campylobacter sputorum subsp. bubulus.

Authors:  W de Vries; H van Berchum; A H Stouthamer
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 2.271

4.  Energy yield of respiration on chloroaromatic compounds in Desulfitobacterium dehalogenans.

Authors:  B A van de Pas; S Jansen; C Dijkema; G Schraa; W M de Vos; A J Stams
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Thiosulfate reduction in Salmonella enterica is driven by the proton motive force.

Authors:  Laura Stoffels; Martin Krehenbrink; Ben C Berks; Gottfried Unden
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  DMSO respiration by the anaerobic rumen bacterium Wolinella succinogenes.

Authors:  J Lorenzen; S Steinwachs; G Unden
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.552

7.  Putative signal peptide on the small subunit of the periplasmic hydrogenase from Desulfovibrio vulgaris.

Authors:  B C Prickril; M H Czechowski; A E Przybyla; H D Peck; J LeGall
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  The mechanism of proton translocation driven by the respiratory nitrate reductase complex of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  R W Jones; A Lamont; P B Garland
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1980-07-15       Impact factor: 3.857

9.  Electron transport-linked proton translocation at nitrite reduction in Campylobacter sputorum subspecies bubulus.

Authors:  W de Vries; H G Niekus; H van Berchum; A H Stouthamer
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 2.552

10.  Production, characterization and determination of the real catalytic properties of the putative 'succinate dehydrogenase' from Wolinella succinogenes.

Authors:  Hanno D Juhnke; Heiko Hiltscher; Hamid R Nasiri; Harald Schwalbe; C Roy D Lancaster
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2008-12-19       Impact factor: 3.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.