Literature DB >> 7356211

Use of the tilt test in measuring acute blood loss.

R Knopp, R Claypool, D Leonardi.   

Abstract

We undertook to determine the accuracy of the tilt test in detecting acute blood loss. One hundred volunteers were phlebotomized a specific amount of blood (Group I, 450 cc; Group II, 1,000 cc in 500 cc increments). Orthostatic vital signs were recorded at timed intervals comparing the supine to sitting and supine to standing techniques. Using the criteria of pulse increase greater than or equal to 30/min or severe symptoms, the supine to standing test accurately distinguished 1,000 cc blood loss from no blood loss in our population. The major value of the tilt test is detecting blood loss of 1,000 cc or more.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7356211     DOI: 10.1016/s0196-0644(80)80333-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  6 in total

1.  Re-examining examination: misconceptions in clinical medicine.

Authors:  Joshua M Brostoff
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Bleeding from a gut lesion as a cause of seizure.

Authors:  Takashi Watari; Yasuharu Tokuda
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2015-05-14

3.  Volume depletion versus dehydration: how understanding the difference can guide therapy.

Authors:  Gautam Bhave; Eric G Neilson
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2011-06-25       Impact factor: 8.860

4.  Hydration assessment using the cardiovascular response to standing.

Authors:  Samuel N Cheuvront; Brett R Ely; Robert W Kenefick; Mark J Buller; Nisha Charkoudian; Michael N Sawka
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-04-06       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Using an expiratory resistor, arterial pulse pressure variations predict fluid responsiveness during spontaneous breathing: an experimental porcine study.

Authors:  Michael K Dahl; Simon T Vistisen; Jacob Koefoed-Nielsen; Anders Larsson
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-03-20       Impact factor: 9.097

6.  Can a central blood volume deficit be detected by systolic pressure variation during spontaneous breathing?

Authors:  Michael Dahl; Chris Hayes; Bodil Steen Rasmussen; Anders Larsson; Niels H Secher
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 2.217

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.