Literature DB >> 7355846

Immune responses to measles and smallpox vaccinations in malnourished children.

A E Ifekwunigwe, N Grasset, R Glass, S Foster.   

Abstract

Children with different levels of nutritional status were studied to determine their immune response to, and complications from, immunization with live measles vaccine and lyophilized smallpox vaccine. Two hundred forty-one children between the ages of 5 months and 9 years were examined to assess their nutritional status at the time of immunization. Sero-conversion was defined as a hemagglutination-inhibition titer to measles virus, of greater than or equal to 1:20 6 to 8 weeks after vaccination in initially sero-negative children. Of 111 initially sero-negative children 94% had an adequate immune response, shown by sero-conversion. Of 193 children without a smallpox vaccinationscar 97% were successfully immunized against smallpox. These rates of immune response were independent of age, sex, and nutritional status of the children. The geometric mean titer rise to measles immunization of groups, whose nutritional status was normal (greater than 90% of median weight for age), mildly (75 to 90%), moderately (60 to 75%), or severely (less than 60%) malnourished were 7.5, 8.8, 7.9, and 7.9, respectively. Malnutrition did not affect the children's ability to develop adequate immune response to measles of smallpox vaccine, and there were no major complications during the 8-week period of follow-up. Since measles is a very severe disease, which in malnourished children can carry a case fatality rate as high as 50%, malnutrition should be a prime indication for measles immunization, and certainly not a contraindication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7355846     DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/33.3.621

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0002-9165            Impact factor:   7.045


  8 in total

Review 1.  Factors That Influence the Immune Response to Vaccination.

Authors:  Petra Zimmermann; Nigel Curtis
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Antibody response to measles immunization in India.

Authors:  J S Job; T J John; A Joseph
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 9.408

3.  Interventions for the control of diarrhoeal diseases among young children: measles immunization.

Authors:  R G Feachem; M A Koblinsky
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 9.408

Review 4.  Malnutrition and vaccination in developing countries.

Authors:  Andrew J Prendergast
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 5.  Indications and contraindications for vaccines used in the Expanded Programme on Immunization.

Authors:  A M Galazka; B A Lauer; R H Henderson; J Keja
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 9.408

6.  Introduction of measles into a highly immunised West African community: the role of health care institutions.

Authors:  P Aaby; J Bukh; I M Lisse; A J Smits
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 3.710

7.  T and B lymphocyte function in response to a protein-free diet.

Authors:  M A Carlomagno; A E Alito; D I Almiron; A Gimeno
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 3.441

Review 8.  Vaccine-induced antibody responses as parameters of the influence of endogenous and environmental factors.

Authors:  H Van Loveren; J G Van Amsterdam; R J Vandebriel; T G Kimman; H C Rümke; P S Steerenberg; J G Vos
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 9.031

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.