Literature DB >> 7354193

Evaluation of vowel normalization procedures.

S F Disner.   

Abstract

Vowel normalization procedures are commonly evaluated on the basis of how effectively they separate the vowels of a single test data set into distinct groups corresponding to the phonetic categories of that language. A quantifiable method of evaluation is proposed here, based on how much of the overall variance is removed from the data. This evaluation method is applied to the vowels of six different Germanic languages which have been normalized according to four different procedures. It is shown that no one normalization procedure is the most effective for all languages. Furthermore, some of the most successful of these normalizations introduce procedural artifacts into the data, and as a result the relative quality of vowels across languages or dialects is altered. In such cases, it is shown that comparison of the normalized vowels of one language with the (separately) normalized vowels of another language are not valid if the vowel systems are different. Some reasons for the appearance of these procedural artifacts are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7354193     DOI: 10.1121/1.383734

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  12 in total

1.  Cross-linguistic studies of children's and adults' vowel spaces.

Authors:  Hyunju Chung; Eun Jong Kong; Jan Edwards; Gary Weismer; Marios Fourakis; Youngdeok Hwang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Some consequences of stimulus variability on speech processing by 2-month-old infants.

Authors:  P W Jusczyk; D B Pisoni; J Mullennix
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1992-06

3.  Vowel acoustic space development in children: a synthesis of acoustic and anatomic data.

Authors:  Houri K Vorperian; Ray D Kent
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  The role of language familiarity in voice identification.

Authors:  J P Goggin; C P Thompson; G Strube; L R Simental
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1991-09

Review 5.  What Acoustic Studies Tell Us About Vowels in Developing and Disordered Speech.

Authors:  Ray D Kent; Carrie Rountrey
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 2.408

6.  Vowel space density as an indicator of speech performance.

Authors:  Brad H Story; Kate Bunton
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Some effects of talker variability on spoken word recognition.

Authors:  J W Mullennix; D B Pisoni; C S Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Corner vowels in males and females ages 4 to 20 years: Fundamental and F1-F4 formant frequencies.

Authors:  Houri K Vorperian; Raymond D Kent; Yen Lee; Daniel M Bolt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Episodic encoding of voice attributes and recognition memory for spoken words.

Authors:  T J Palmeri; S D Goldinger; D B Pisoni
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Variability in English vowels is comparable in articulation and acoustics.

Authors:  Aude Noiray; Khalil Iskarous; D H Whalen
Journal:  Lab Phonol       Date:  2014-05-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.