Literature DB >> 7353342

Smokers' response to shortened cigarettes: dose reduction without dilution of tobacco smoke.

M A Russell, S R Sutton, C Feyerabend, Y Saloojee.   

Abstract

This study was designed to examine the response of smokers to shortening their usual brand of cigarettes. The shortening reduces the dose of smoke available from each cigarette without affecting concentration and therefore differs from dose reduction by dilution, which occurs when smokers switch to cigarettes with lower tar and nicotine deliveries. Measures of smoking behavior (e.g., cigarette consumption, puff rate), mouth-level nicotine intake (calculated from butt content), and intake to the lungs (plasma nicotine and COHb) were made in 10 smokers after 48 hr ad libitum smoking of full, three-quarter, and half-length cigarettes in a Latin square design. Mouth-level smoke intake was maintained on shortened cigarettes due to a combination of 2 types of compensatory maneuver: (1) by increasing the intensity of puffing and thereby extracting proportionately more of the smoke available from each cigarette and (2) by smoking more cigarettes. The amount of smoke inhaled, on the other hand, was only partially maintained (58% compensation). This was achieved by increase in cigarette consumption alone. There was achieved by increase in cigarette consumption alone. There was no evidence of any compensatory increase in the amount of smoke inhaled from each cigarette. Increase in consumption was thus the only maneuver that contributed to maintaining smoke intake at lung level; mouth-level intake was regulated by increasing intake per cigarette as well as consumption.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7353342     DOI: 10.1038/clpt.1980.33

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0009-9236            Impact factor:   6.875


  6 in total

Review 1.  Behavioral economics of drug self-administration. III. A reanalysis of the nicotine regulation hypothesis.

Authors:  R J DeGrandpre; W K Bickel; J R Hughes; S T Higgins
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Comment on the Hunter Committee's second report.

Authors:  M J Jarvis; M A Russell
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1980-04-05

3.  Smoke yield of cigarettes and puffing behavior in men and women.

Authors:  K Bättig; R Buzzi; R Nil
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Nicotine concentrations in urine and saliva of smokers and non-smokers.

Authors:  C Feyerabend; T Higenbottam; M A Russell
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1982-04-03

5.  Cigarette Relighting: A Series of Pilot Studies Investigating a Common Yet Understudied Smoking Behavior.

Authors:  Carolyn J Heckman; Olivia A Wackowski; Rohit Mukherjee; Dorothy K Hatsukami; Irina Stepanov; Cristine D Delnevo; Michael B Steinberg
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 6.  Portion, package or tableware size for changing selection and consumption of food, alcohol and tobacco.

Authors:  Gareth J Hollands; Ian Shemilt; Theresa M Marteau; Susan A Jebb; Hannah B Lewis; Yinghui Wei; Julian P T Higgins; David Ogilvie
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-09-14
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.