Literature DB >> 7350394

Ambulatory medical care: a comparison of internists and family-general practitioners.

J Noren, T Frazier, I Altman, J DeLozier.   

Abstract

We analyzed data from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey to compare the style of practice of two primary-care providers, general internists and family-general practitioners. Whereas internists spent 18.4 minutes with the average patient, family-general practitioners spent 13.0 minutes. Whereas internists used laboratory tests in 73 per cent of visits and x-ray tests in 53 per cent, family-general practitioners used these studies in 34 and 19 per cent of visits. Internists provided instructions regarding health problems in 17.8 per cent of visits, and family-general practitioners in 12.4 per cent. The two provider groups did not differ in terms of therapy for emotional problems, both providing it in a relatively low proportion of visits (3 per cent). Whether by choice or necessity, family-general practitioners spent less time examining and instructing patients, and they ordered fewer laboratory and x-ray studies. The implications of these differences for the cost and quality of primary care need further study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7350394     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM198001033020103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  25 in total

1.  Identification of psychosocial distress: a comparison of internal medicine and family medicine residents.

Authors:  M Rosenberg; K Commerford; M Driever
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1991 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Diagnostic test restraint and the specialty consultation.

Authors:  R L Braham; A Ron; H S Ruchlin; J P Hollenberg; P Pompei; M E Charlson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1990 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Postgraduate training: time to reassess.

Authors:  W J Westwick
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Referrals in primary care: is the family physician a "gatekeeper"?

Authors:  P G Norton; E V Dunn; D Bestvater
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 3.275

5.  Assessment of family physicians' knowledge of social and community services.

Authors:  M A Craven; N Kates; P Raso
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 3.275

6.  Issues in survey data on medical practice: some empirical comparisons.

Authors:  H P Greenwald; L G Hart
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1986 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

7.  Changes in the distribution of physicians in rural areas of Minnesota, 1965-85.

Authors:  T Dennis
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  A critique of the Harvard Resource-Based Relative Value Scale.

Authors:  L F McMahon
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Cost effectiveness of treating primary care patients in accident and emergency: a comparison between general practitioners, senior house officers, and registrars.

Authors:  J Dale; H Lang; J A Roberts; J Green; E Glucksman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-05-25

10.  Race, resource use, and survival in seriously ill hospitalized adults. The SUPPORT Investigators.

Authors:  R S Phillips; M B Hamel; J M Teno; P Bellamy; S K Broste; R M Califf; H Vidaillet; R B Davis; L H Muhlbaier; A F Connors
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.