Literature DB >> 7346529

Effects of infused histamine on asthmatic and normal subjects: comparison of skin test responses.

R Summers, R Sigler, J H Shelhamer, M Kaliner.   

Abstract

The effect of histamine infused intravenously at sequentially increasing concentrations (0.05, 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, and 1 microgram/kg/min) on the wheal responses to intradermal histamine and compound 48/80 in eight normal and five asthmatic subjects and to allergen skin tests in five asthmatic subjects was measured. These measurements were repeated following pretreatment with the H-1 antagonist hydroxyzine or the H-2 antagonist cimetidine, either alone or in combination. Histamine infused in progressively increasing concentrations had no effect on histamine, compound 48/80, or allergen skin tests either before or after H-1 or H-2 antihistamine treatment. No significant difference was found in the concentration of histamine or compound 48/80 required to elicit a 10-mm wheal in normal or asthmatic patients. Pretreatment with the H-2 antagonist alone had no effect on histamine or compound 48/80 skin tests in either group. However, the H-1 antagonist significantly reduced the wheal response to histamine (p less than 0.05 normal; p less than 0.025 asthmatics) and compound 48/80 (p less than 0.05 normal; p less than 0.025 asthmatics) in both groups. The combination of H-1 and H-2 histamine antagonists was not significantly different from the H-1 antagonist alone. Antigen skin testing was suppressed 82% by the hydroxyzine alone; no significant suppression was induced by cimetidine alone, and the combination of hydroxyzine plus cimetidine was only slightly more effective than hydroxyzine alone. The results indicate that blockade of histamine H-2 receptors with cimetidine has little or no additive effect on H-1 antagonist-suppressed skin test responses to histamine, compound 48/80, or antigen. Furthermore, the capacity of histamine to suppress histamine release in vitro from basophils was not demonstrated in vivo assessing skin mast cell responses. This observation combined with earlier studies on the human lung mast cell, which also failed to demonstrate that histamine had an inhibitory action, suggests that the human mast cell may not respond to histamine like the basophil and that this discrepancy may represent a fundamental difference in the cell types.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7346529     DOI: 10.1016/0091-6749(81)90099-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol        ISSN: 0091-6749            Impact factor:   10.793


  3 in total

Review 1.  Urticaria and angioedema.

Authors:  B A Burrall; A C Huntley
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy       Date:  1985-02

2.  The influence of ranitidine, alone and in combination with clemastine, on histamine-mediated cutaneous weal and flare reactions in human skin.

Authors:  R H Thomas; P D Browne; J D Kirby
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Modification by CO2 of endothelin-1-induced contraction of isolated guinea pig trachea.

Authors:  A Tsukui; S Fukuda; T Honda; H Fujihara; K Sakuma; K Shimoji
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 5.063

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.