Literature DB >> 7342993

EP components, visual processing stages, and the effect of a barbiturate.

H W Frowein, A W Gaillard, C A Varey.   

Abstract

In a 2 x 2 x 2 factorial experiment, ten subjects carried out a visual choice reaction task. In addition to RT measurement, evoked potentials (EPs) were recorded from the central (Cz) and occipital (Oz) derivations. Independent variables were drug treatment (barbiturate versus placebo), visual stimulus intensity and visual stimulus degradation. The reaction time data showed that visual intensity and degradation had additive effects, which indicates that these variables affect independent stages, i.e. stimulus preprocessing and stimulus encoding. The effect of barbiturate on RT was additive with intensity but appeared to interact with degradation. This suggests a selective effect of that drug on the encoding state. EP components also showed selective effects of intensity, degradation and drug treatment. It was suggested that these components may be related to stages in the reaction process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7342993     DOI: 10.1016/0301-0511(81)90039-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Psychol        ISSN: 0301-0511            Impact factor:   3.251


  6 in total

1.  The influence of antihistamines on human performance.

Authors:  A W Gaillard; A Gruisen; R de Jong
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  The effects of sleep deprivation and incentives on human performance.

Authors:  F J Steyvers; A W Gaillard
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1993

3.  Letter-naming as a function of intensity, degradation, S-R compatibility, and practice.

Authors:  B L Everett; L Hochhaus; J R Brown
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1985-05

Review 4.  Performance tests.

Authors:  A Wetherell
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 9.031

5.  Histamine H1 receptor blockade predominantly impairs sensory processes in human sensorimotor performance.

Authors:  P van Ruitenbeek; A Vermeeren; F T Y Smulders; A Sambeth; W J Riedel
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 8.739

6.  Effects of oral scopolamine on human stimulus evaluation.

Authors:  E Callaway; R Halliday; H Naylor; G Schechter
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.530

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.