Literature DB >> 733285

Neurological recovery distal to the zone of injury in 172 cases of closed, traumatic spinal cord injury.

J S Young, W R Dexter.   

Abstract

The Southwest Regional System for Treatment of Spinal Cord Injury (Good Samaritan Hospital and St Joseph's Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona) treated 325 cases of traumatic spinal cord injury during the period June 1970 through December 1975. Of these, 172 met the study population criteria of the cases reported by Frankel et al. (1969) in their paper 'The value of postural reduction in the initial management of closed injuries of the spine with paraplegia and tetraplegia'. These cases are compared with those reported by Frankel et al. (1969). Cases were divided into neurological categories. The demography of the two study populations was amazingly similar as was the neurological results. The means for the reported neurological changes show that the average recovery for patients treated at Stoke Mandeville was slightly greater for each neurological category; however, this difference was statistically significant only for cervical cases (P less than 0.01). One of the differences in the treatment given by the two centres was that the Southwest Regional System performed surgery on 39% of its cases and Stoke Mandeville none. The Southwest Regional System's non-operated cervical cases showed less average neurological recovery than Stoke Mandeville cervical cases (P less than 0.001). Comparison between the Southwest Regional System non-operated cases and operated cases revealed no significant differences within any neurological category. The average neurological change reported by both centres was relatively small, documenting that from the onset of injury the majority of people sustaining spinal cord injury are committed to living with paralysis, in most cases severe, for the rest of their lives.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 733285     DOI: 10.1038/sc.1978.6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Paraplegia        ISSN: 0031-1758


  7 in total

1.  A prospective study on acute spinal injuries.

Authors:  M Zileli; I Ovül; E Tunçbay
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  Acute spinal cord trauma: is there more hope in the future?

Authors:  H W Barr
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1979-12-08       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 3.  Patterns of cervical spine injury and their associated lesions.

Authors:  A N Guthkelch; A S Fleischer
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1987-10

Review 4.  Current concepts in the immediate management of acute spinal cord injuries.

Authors:  C H Tator; D W Rowed
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1979-12-08       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  The value of more aggressive management in traumatic paraplegia.

Authors:  R Braakman
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.042

6.  Spinal canal restoration by posterior distraction or anterior decompression in thoracolumbar spinal fractures and its influence on neurological outcome.

Authors:  P Korovessis; G Piperos; P Sidiropoulos; A Karagiannis; T Dimas
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  Who is going to walk? A review of the factors influencing walking recovery after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Giorgio Scivoletto; Federica Tamburella; Letizia Laurenza; Monica Torre; Marco Molinari
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 3.169

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.