Literature DB >> 7327389

The chromosomes of turkey embryos during early stages of parthenogenetic development.

K Harada, E G Buss.   

Abstract

In the early stages of parthenogenetic development in turkey eggs, many blastoderms are mosaics of haploid, diploid and polyploid cells. The genome composition of these blastoderms can be identified by C-banding. They may be generally described as either A-Z/2A-ZZ/nA-nZ or A-W/2A-WW/nA-nW and are found in a nearly 1:1 ratio. The blastoderms showing the W body (W+) become lethal within two days of incubation. The haploid cell proportion decreases rapidly during the early stage of development, and, as haploid cells decrease, the proportion of polyploid cells appears to increase. At six days of incubation, various kinds of parthenogenetic development can be observed. Their genome compositions are either diploid (2A-ZZ) or mosaic (A-Z/2A-ZZ). These findings suggest that diploid parthenogenesis occurs by either suppression of meiosis II or chromosome doubling some time after the first cleavage division. The frequent occurrence of mosaic blastoderms indicates that the majority, if not all, of the parthenogenetic embryos initiate their development in haploid ova.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7327389      PMCID: PMC1214443     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  12 in total

1.  Evidence of heterozygosity in parthenogenetic turkeys from homograft responses.

Authors:  H K POOLE; W V HEALEY; P S RUSSELL; M W OLSEN
Journal:  Proc Soc Exp Biol Med       Date:  1963-07

2.  Haploid mouse blastocysts developed from bisected zygotes.

Authors:  A K Tarkowski; J Rossant
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1976-02-26       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  In vitro development of haploid mouse embryos produced by bisection of one-cell fertilized eggs.

Authors:  A K Tarkowki
Journal:  J Embryol Exp Morphol       Date:  1977-04

4.  Viable chimaeras produced from normal and parthenogenetic mouse embryos.

Authors:  L C Stevens; D S Varnum; E M Eicher
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1977-10-06       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Microsurgically produced homozygous-diploid uniparental mice.

Authors:  P C Hoppe; K Illmensee
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1977-12       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  A simple technique for demonstrating centromeric heterochromatin.

Authors:  A T Sumner
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1972-11       Impact factor: 3.905

7.  Haploid chicken embryos: evidence for diploid and triploid cell populations.

Authors:  S E Bloom
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  1970 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.645

8.  The XO and Oy chromosome constitutions in the mouse.

Authors:  T Morris
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1968-10       Impact factor: 1.588

9.  Cytological and Cytophotometric Analysis of Binucleated Red Blood Cell Mutants (bn) in Turkeys (MELEAGRIS GALLOPAVO).

Authors:  S E Bloom; E G Buss; G K Strother
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1970-05       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Turkey-chicken hybrids: a cytological study of early development.

Authors:  K Harada; E G Buss
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  1981 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.645

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Genomic imprinting in plants: observations and evolutionary implications.

Authors:  M Alleman; J Doctor
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.076

2.  With or Without W? Molecular and Cytogenetic Markers are Not Sufficient for Identification of Environmentally-Induced Sex Reversal in the Bearded Dragon.

Authors:  Jan Ehl; Marie Altmanová; Lukáš Kratochvíl
Journal:  Sex Dev       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 1.824

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.