Literature DB >> 7325246

The design of the normal aortic valve.

M Thubrikar, W C Piepgrass, T W Shaner, S P Nolan.   

Abstract

The design parameters of the natural aortic valve in vivo were not known, which may explain why various bioprosthetic valves have been designed differently. The design of the aortic valve was studied in vivo by placing radiopaque markers in the valve. The marker movement revealed that, during a cardiac cycle, the design parameters of the valve were changing continuously with changing aortic pressure and ventricular geometry. During diastole decreasing radius of the commissures (Rc) and increasing radius of the bases (Rb) caused the leaflets to tilt toward the ventricle, thereby decreasing the bottom surface angle (alpha) and increasing the free-edge angle (phi) of the leaflet. During systole Rc increased, Rb decreased, and interleaflet distance decreased, causing a change in the geometry of the open valve from conical to cylindrical. In middiastole the design parameters were Rb/Rc = 1.2, H/Rc = 1.4, phi = 34 degrees, and alpha = 20 degrees, where H is sinus height. How a significant deviation from the design could compromise the efficiency and longevity of the valve is discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7325246     DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.1981.241.6.H795

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol        ISSN: 0002-9513


  17 in total

1.  Fluid-Structure Interactions of the Mitral Valve and Left Heart: Comprehensive Strategies, Past, Present and Future.

Authors:  Daniel R Einstein; Facundo Del Pin; Xiangmin Jiao; Andrew P Kuprat; James P Carson; Karyn S Kunzelman; Richard P Cochran; Julius M Guccione; Mark B Ratcliffe
Journal:  Int J Numer Methods Eng       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.477

2.  Cyclic changes in area- and perimeter-derived effective dimensions of the aortic annulus measured with multislice computed tomography and comparison with metric intraoperative sizing.

Authors:  Won-Keun Kim; Alexander Meyer; Helge Möllmann; Andreas Rolf; Susanne Möllmann; Johannes Blumenstein; Arnaud Van Linden; Christian W Hamm; Thomas Walther; Jörg Kempfert
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 3.  Heart valve function: a biomechanical perspective.

Authors:  Michael S Sacks; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  Heart Valve Biomechanics and Underlying Mechanobiology.

Authors:  Salma Ayoub; Giovanni Ferrari; Robert C Gorman; Joseph H Gorman; Frederick J Schoen; Michael S Sacks
Journal:  Compr Physiol       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 9.090

5.  Clinical implications of pulmonary regurgitation in healthy individuals: detection by cross sectional pulsed Doppler echocardiography.

Authors:  S Takao; K Miyatake; S Izumi; M Okamoto; N Kinoshita; H Nakagawa; K Yamamoto; H Sakakibara; Y Nimura
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1988-05

6.  Deformation of the dog aortic valve ring during the cardiac cycle.

Authors:  R J van Renterghem; A A van Steenhoven; T Arts; R S Reneman
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 3.657

7.  The surface anatomy of the human aortic valve as revealed by scanning electron microscopy.

Authors:  J M Hurle; E Colvee; M A Fernandez-Teran
Journal:  Anat Embryol (Berl)       Date:  1985

8.  Optimal elastomeric scaffold leaflet shape for pulmonary heart valve leaflet replacement.

Authors:  Rong Fan; Ahmed S Bayoumi; Peter Chen; Christopher M Hobson; William R Wagner; John E Mayer; Michael S Sacks
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Calibrated cusp sizers to facilitate aortic valve repair: development and clinical application.

Authors:  Mohammad Bashar Izzat
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2011-11-29

10.  The clinical anatomy and pathology of the human arterial valves: implications for repair or replacement.

Authors:  Michael G Bateman; Alexander J Hill; Jason L Quill; Paul A Iaizzo
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 4.132

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.