Literature DB >> 7318624

The length of the anal canal.

S Nivatvongs, H S Stern, D S Fryd.   

Abstract

The authors measured the length of the surgical anal canal (anorectal ring to anal verge) in 108 men and 103 women; the age ranged from 18 to 90 years (average 59 years). The average length of the surgical anal canal was 4.2 cm (range 3.0-5.3 cm). In men the average length was 4.4 cm (range 3.2-5.3 cm) compared with the average length of 4.9 cm (range 3.0-5.0 cm) in women (P less than 0.001). The average length of the anatomic anal canal (dentate line to anal verge) was 2.1 cm (range 1.0-3.8 cm). In men, the average length was 2.2 cm (range 1.4-3.8 cm), whereas in women the average length was 2.0 cm (range 1.0-3.2 cm) (P less than .01). The length of the anatomic anal canal has no relationship to the length of the surgical anal canal or vice versa (P less than 0.1). There was no statistically significant difference in the length of the surgical anal canal or the anatomic anal canal in persons below 60 years old versus those above in either sex (P greater than 0.01).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7318624     DOI: 10.1007/bf02605754

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  23 in total

1.  Dosimetric planning study for the prevention of anal complications after post-operative whole pelvic radiotherapy in cervical cancer patients with hemorrhoids.

Authors:  J G Baek; E C Kim; S K Kim; H Jang
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Current concepts in anal fissures.

Authors:  Abraham A Ayantunde; Samuel A Debrah
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  Intersphincteric Resection Pushing the Envelope for Sphincter Preservation.

Authors:  Quentin Denost; Eric Rullier
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2017-11-27

4.  Topography of the extrinsic internal anal sphincter nerve supply during laparoscopic-assisted TAMIS TME: five key zones of risk from the surgeons' view.

Authors:  Werner Kneist; Andreas D Rink; Daniel W Kauff; Moritz A Konerding; Hauke Lang
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Sphincter-saving resection for all rectal carcinomas: the end of the 2-cm distal rule.

Authors:  Eric Rullier; Christophe Laurent; Frédéric Bretagnol; Anne Rullier; Véronique Vendrely; Frank Zerbib
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Comparison of the clinical results of abdominoperanal intersphincteric resection and abdominoperineal resection for lower rectal cancer.

Authors:  Shunsuke Tsukamoto; Yukihide Kanemitsu; Dai Shida; Hiroki Ochiai; Junichi Mazaki
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 7.  Adequate length of the distal resection margin in rectal cancer: from the oncological point of view.

Authors:  In Ja Park; Jin Cheon Kim
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Anorectal physiology: test and clinical application.

Authors:  Hyeon-Min Cho
Journal:  J Korean Soc Coloproctol       Date:  2010-10-31

9.  Changing patterns of treatment for chronic anal fissure.

Authors:  R Farouk; J Gunn; G S Duthie
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 1.891

10.  Anal Cancer Incidence in the United States, 1977-2011: Distinct Patterns by Histology and Behavior.

Authors:  Meredith S Shiels; Aimée R Kreimer; Anna E Coghill; Teresa M Darragh; Susan S Devesa
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 4.254

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.