Literature DB >> 7317770

The value of preserving the anal sphincter in operations for ulcerative colitis and polyposis: a review of 22 mucosal proctectomies.

D Johnston, N S Williams, D E Neal, A I Axon.   

Abstract

Ulcerative colitis and polyposis are both diseases of the mucosa. They can be cured by colectomy combined with selective mucosal proctectomy, without sacrifice of teh anal sphincters or damage to bladder or sexual function. Terminal ileum, either as a straight tube or in the form of a pouch, is drawn down through the denuded tube of anorectal muscle and anastomosed to the mid-anal canal. A temporary defunctioning ileostomy is always used. Caecum has also been used as a neorectum after mucosal proctectomy, but without long term success. Twenty-two patients, 20 with ulcerative colitis and 2 with polyposis, have been treated by mucosal proctectomy in the past 4 years, with no mortality. The caeco-anal procedure proved a failure because of recurrence of colitis, although the early functional results were good. After ileo-anal anastomosis, continence was perfect by day, but 2 patients had occasional lapses at night. The disadvantage of straight ileo-anal anastomosis is frequency of bowel action (6-9 times a day), even with codeine medication, although the patients considered the operation a success. Some form of pelvic reservoir is therefore desirable and our early experience with the triplicated ileal pouch is encouraging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7317770     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800681213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  8 in total

1.  Experience with mucosal proctectomy and a J-shaped ileal reservoir in ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  T V Taylor
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 2.  The continent ileostomy (Kock's pouch) versus the restorative proctocolectomy (pelvic pouch).

Authors:  L Hultén
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Histology of the healing process after total colectomy, mucosal proctectomy and ileo-anostomy.

Authors:  T Iwama; M Imajo; S Matsuo; S Sawai; J Utsunomiya; Y Mishima
Journal:  Jpn J Surg       Date:  1983-09

4.  Functional assessment after colectomy, mucosal proctectomy, and endorectal ileoanal pull-through.

Authors:  J M Becker; A E Hillard; F A Mann; A Kestenberg; J A Nelson
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 5.  Evolution of the restorative proctocolectomy and its effects on gastrointestinal hormones.

Authors:  Amosy E M'Koma; Paul E Wise; Roberta L Muldoon; David A Schwartz; Mary K Washington; Alan J Herline
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-06-19       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  The clinical and functional outcome after restorative proctocolectomy. A prospective study in 100 patients.

Authors:  T Oresland; S Fasth; S Nordgren; L Hultén
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  The effects on pelvic visceral function of anal sphincter ablating and anal sphincter preserving operations for cancer of the lower part of the rectum and for benign colo-rectal disease.

Authors:  D E Neal
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  Restorative proctocolectomy with end to end pouch-anal anastomosis in patients over the age of fifty.

Authors:  W G Lewis; P M Sagar; P J Holdsworth; A T Axon; D Johnston
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 23.059

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.