Literature DB >> 7313935

Infrapopliteal arterial bypass for limb salvage: increased patency and utilization of the saphenous vein used "in situ".

R P Leather, D M Shan, A M Karmody.   

Abstract

A prospective study of "in situ" saphenous vein has been made to determine its patency and utilization when used for arterial bypass distal to the popliteal artery. The valvular obstructions to arterial flow were removed by the method of valve incision developed by the authors. Of 316 consecutive "in situ" bypass procedures, 133 attempts were made to complete the procedure to the infrapopliteal level for limb salvage. One hundred and twenty-four of these were completed, to 43 peroneal, 40 posterior tibial, 25 anterior tibial, and 16 tibioperoneal arteries. At the level of its distal transection, the saphenous veins had diameters of 3.5 to 2.5 mm in 58 cases (45%). Only 7% of these procedures could not be completed without resorting to the use of excised vein segments. There were seven occlusions within 30 days (94% immediate patency rate). Cumulative patency rates by life-table analysis at 1, 2, and 3 years were 87%, 82%, and 72%, respectively. Neither the vein diameter nor the location of the distal anastomosis had any effect on these patency rates. In spite of the immediate failure rate of 15% to 30%, reversed autogenous saphenous vein is the present material of choice for infrapopliteal bypass. However, when the generally accepted minimum diameter of 4 mm is applied, at least 25% of these veins may not meet this criterion. These data show that the "in situ" method allows for both increased bypass patency and utilization of saphenous vein by permitting the consistent use of increased bypass patency and utilization of saphenous vein by permitting the consistent use of veins of 3.5 mm diameter or less. The summation of these improved utilization and patency rates has resulted in a greater number of functioning bypasses when compared to the present experience with reversed saphenous vein and/or nonautogenous substitutes in current use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7313935

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  15 in total

Review 1.  Current techniques for infrainguinal arterial reconstruction.

Authors:  A Whittemore
Journal:  Jpn J Surg       Date:  1990-11

2.  Anatomical bases of the bypass-flap: study of the thoracodorsal axis.

Authors:  Serguei Malikov; Dominique Casanova; Pierre Edouard Magnan; Alain Branchereau; Pierre Champsaur
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2005-01-19       Impact factor: 1.246

Review 3.  Factors contributing to success and failure of femorotibial bypass grafts.

Authors:  D F Courtney; W R Flinn; W J McCarthy; J S Yao; J J Bergan
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Resurrection of the in situ saphenous vein bypass. 1000 cases later.

Authors:  R P Leather; D M Shah; B B Chang; J L Kaufman
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Reversed vein bypass to infrapopliteal arteries. Modern results are superior to or equivalent to in-situ bypass for patency and for vein utilization.

Authors:  L M Taylor; J M Edwards; E S Phinney; J M Porter
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  In situ tibial reconstruction. State-of-the-art or passing fancy.

Authors:  D Buchbinder; D L Rollins; C M Semrow; J J Schuler; J P Meyer; D P Flanigan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Long-term results of in situ saphenous vein bypass. Analysis of 2058 cases.

Authors:  D M Shah; R C Darling; B B Chang; K M Fitzgerald; P S Paty; R P Leather
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Successful long-term limb salvage using cephalic vein bypass grafts.

Authors:  R W Harris; G Andros; L B Dulawa; R W Oblath; S X Salles-Cunha; R Apyan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Retrograde valve incision for insitu vein-arterial bypass utilising a valvulotome.

Authors:  J D Corson; A M Karmody; D M Shah; R P Leather
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 1.891

10.  Nonreversed and in situ vein grafts. Clinical and experimental observations.

Authors:  R C Batson; V S Sottiurai
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.