Literature DB >> 7310593

Relative bioavailability of intravenous chloramphenicol succinate and oral chloramphenicol palmitate in infants and children.

R E Kauffman, M C Thirumoorthi, J A Buckley, M K Aravind, A S Dajani.   

Abstract

The relative bioavailability of intravenously administered chloramphenicol succinate and orally administered chloramphenicol palmitate was compared in 18 children, age 2 months to 14 years. The area under the serum concentration vs time curve of chloramphenicol and urinary excretion of chloramphenicol succinate were determined in each child under steady-state conditions while receiving chloramphenicol succinate and again while receiving chloramphenicol palmitate. The mean AUC was significantly greater during oral therapy compared to intravenous therapy (110 vs 78 mg hr/L, P less than 0.001). The relative bioavailability of chloramphenicol succinate was 70% compared to chloramphenicol palmitate. This could be explained by the mean loss of 36% of the intravenous dose in the urine as unhydrolyzed chloramphenicol succinate. The intravenous dose of chloramphenicol succinate did not correlate with AUC (r = 0.193). However, there was a significant correlation between the oral dose of chloramphenicol palmitate and AUC (r = 0.429, P = 0.025). The bioavailability of orally administered chloramphenicol palmitate is superior to that of chloramphenicol succinate given intravenously. Furthermore, there is a greater correlation between dose and amount of active drug in the body when the oral preparation is used. Oral administration of chloramphenicol palmitate appears to offer significant therapeutic advantages in patients who can tolerate medication given orally.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7310593     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3476(81)80034-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr        ISSN: 0022-3476            Impact factor:   4.406


  15 in total

1.  Neonatal pharmacology--a practical approach.

Authors:  D A MacKintosh
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  1986 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.967

2.  Current antibiotic usage, I: Penicillins, cephalosporins and chloramphenicol.

Authors:  S M Merchant; N P Vithlani
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  1986 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.967

Review 3.  Classification and treatment of pneumonia.

Authors:  R Bahl; N Bhandari; M K Bhan
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  1994 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.967

4.  Decreased chloramphenicol clearance in malnourished Ethiopian children.

Authors:  M Ashton; P Bolme; E Alemayehu; M Eriksson; L Paalzow
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  Chloramphenicol therapy in the neonate.

Authors:  V K Paul
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  1983 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.967

6.  Oral or parenteral antibiotic treatment in serious infections.

Authors:  J Symonds
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 3.791

7.  Oral chloramphenicol therapy for multiple liver abscesses in hyperimmunoglobulinemia E syndrome.

Authors:  S Fanconi; R A Seger; U Willi; R Otto; H Spiess; F H Kayser; W H Hitzig
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 3.183

Review 8.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of chloramphenicol and chloramphenicol succinate.

Authors:  P J Ambrose
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1984 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.447

9.  Comparison of ceftriaxone and traditional therapy of bacterial meningitis.

Authors:  B L Congeni
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Chloramphenicol in paediatrics: current prescribing practice and the need to monitor.

Authors:  A Mulhall; D J Berry; J de Louvois
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 3.183

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.