Literature DB >> 7306875

Bacillus thuringiensis distribution in soils of the United States.

A J DeLucca, J G Simonson, A D Larson.   

Abstract

During a 2-year study, samples of various types of soils were collected from 115 fields that had not previously been tested with Bacillus thuringiensis and which were remote from any large-scale aggregations of lepidopterous insects in rearing or grain-storage areas. An average of about 400 isolates were examined from each soil, and, of 46 373 isolates examined, only 250 (0.5%) were identified as B. thuringiensis. While it was almost impossible to insure that a field had never been treated with B. thuringiensis or that drift from some nearby application had not reached the field, it is noteworthy that of the 250 isolates, 156 (62.4%) were not var. kurstaki, the only variety that has been used commercially in the United States in about 10 years. This is a strong indication that the B. thuringiensis isolates observed were present naturally. To verify the procedures used, samples were taken from two adjacent experimental plots which had been treated about 12 months previously with formulations of var. kurstaki and var. galleriae, respectively. With practically no exception, the variety recovered from each plot was the variety applied, indicating that the varietal status of B. thuringiensis is stable in the soil.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7306875     DOI: 10.1139/m81-137

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Microbiol        ISSN: 0008-4166            Impact factor:   2.419


  20 in total

1.  Low persistence of Bacillus thuringiensis serovar israelensis spores in four mosquito biotopes of a salt marsh in southern France.

Authors:  Myriam Hajaij; Alexandre Carron; Julien Deleuze; Bruno Gaven; Marie-Laure Setier-Rio; Gerard Vigo; Isabelle Thiéry; Christina Nielsen-LeRoux; Christophe Lagneau
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 4.552

2.  Distribution of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis in Soil of a Swiss Wetland reserve after 22 years of mosquito control.

Authors:  Valeria Guidi; Nicola Patocchi; Peter Lüthy; Mauro Tonolla
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Isolation of Bacillus thuringiensis from Stored Tobacco and Lasioderma serricorne (F.).

Authors:  P Kaelin; P Morel; F Gadani
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  The Phylloplane as a Source of Bacillus thuringiensis Variants.

Authors:  R A Smith; G A Couche
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Selective Process for Efficient Isolation of Soil Bacillus spp.

Authors:  R S Travers; P A Martin; C F Reichelderfer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Distribution, Frequency, and Diversity of Bacillus thuringiensis in an Animal Feed Mill.

Authors:  M P Meadows; D J Ellis; J Butt; P Jarrett; H D Burges
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Worldwide Abundance and Distribution of Bacillus thuringiensis Isolates.

Authors:  P A Martin; R S Travers
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 8.  Bacillus thuringiensis and its pesticidal crystal proteins.

Authors:  E Schnepf; N Crickmore; J Van Rie; D Lereclus; J Baum; J Feitelson; D R Zeigler; D H Dean
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 11.056

9.  Public health implications of the microbial pesticide Bacillus thuringiensis: an epidemiological study, Oregon, 1985-86.

Authors:  M Green; M Heumann; R Sokolow; L R Foster; R Bryant; M Skeels
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Isolation of Multiple Subspecies of Bacillus thuringiensis from a Population of the European Sunflower Moth, Homoeosoma nebulella.

Authors:  C Itoua-Apoyolo; L Drif; J M Vassal; H Debarjac; J P Bossy; F Leclant; R Frutos
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.