Literature DB >> 7302233

Prospective analysis of the value of scrotal ultrasound.

P H Arger, C B Mulhern, B G Coleman, H M Pollack, A Wein, J Koss, R Arenson, M Banner.   

Abstract

Ultrasound was evaluated in 69 patients for its usefulness in distinguishing scrotal abnormalities requiring surgery from those that may have clinical follow-up only. Distinction was possible in the majority of cases. On imaging, tumor showed decreased echogenicity within the testicle, which was usually enlarged. Epididymal enlargement, marked increase in peritesticular fluid, and skin thickening suggest a non tumorous condition. The ultrasound characteristics of various scrotal abnormalities are described.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7302233     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.141.3.7302233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  2 in total

1.  Scrotal ultrasound.

Authors:  K M Desai; J M Haworth; J C Gingell
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Testicular plasmacytoma misdiagnosed as orchitis.

Authors:  Christopher Schiavo; Steven Alexander Mann; Jesse Mer; Attaya Suvannasankha
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2018-06-04
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.