Literature DB >> 729827

Classification of adnexal adhesions: a proposal and evaluation of its prognostic value.

J F Hulka, K Omran, G S Berger.   

Abstract

A system of classification of adnexal disease is proposed. Hysterosalpingography is important to determine tubal patency (stage I) and to distinguish between the presence of rugae in early fillage of the ampullae (stage II) and their absence (stage III or IV). Diagnostic laparoscopy under general anesthesia with the double-puncture technique is recommended to inspect the ovaries thoroughly and to put adhesions on a stretch for evaluation of thin, avascular adhesions (A) and thick, vascularized adhesions (B). The extent of adnexal disease can be classified as stage I minimal if most or all of the ovarian surface is visible; stage II, over 50% of the ovary is visible; stage III, less than 50% of the ovary is visible; Stage IV, no ovarian surface is visible. Each adnexum should be described separately. The worst aspect of each adnexum should be described. The best adnexal classification should be used in describing the patient for purposes of comparing surgical treatments. Using this approach, the authors describe a gradient from stage I (best prognosis) to stage IV (poorest) in a personal series of 99 tuboplasties over a 10-year period.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 729827

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  10 in total

Review 1.  Potential role of statins on wound healing: review of the literature.

Authors:  Shadi Farsaei; Hossein Khalili; Effat Sadat Farboud
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  A new classification system for pregnancy prognosis of tubal factor infertility.

Authors:  Shi-En Zou; Yi Jin; Yi-Ling Ko; Jin Zhu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-05-15

3.  Ovum pickup for in vitro fertilization: a cause of mechanical infertility?

Authors:  J Ashkenazi; D Feldberg; M B David; M Shelef; D Dicker; J A Goldman
Journal:  J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf       Date:  1987-08

4.  Simvastatin improves wound strength after intestinal anastomosis in the rat.

Authors:  G Karadeniz Cakmak; O Irkorucu; B H Ucan; A U Emre; B Bahadir; C Demirtas; O Tascilar; K Karakaya; S Acikgoz; G Kertis; H Ankarali; H Pasaoglu; M Comert
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-07-04       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Factors influencing the success of microsurgery for distal tubal occlusion.

Authors:  T J Laatikainen; A K Tenhunen; P K Venesmaa; D L Apter
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.344

6.  A comparison of two anastomotic techniques in the jejunum of the goat.

Authors:  H A Al-Timmemi; Karim Al-Jashamy; Mohammed S Dauod
Journal:  Vet Med Int       Date:  2010-11-01

7.  The effect of Bosentan on healing of colonic anastomosis.

Authors:  Ziya Cetinkaya; Kazim Esen; Ibrahim Hanefi Ozercan; Bilal Ustundag; Refik Ayten; Erhan Aygen
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2006-12-18       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 8.  Is There Still a Place for Reconstructive Surgery in Distal Tubal Disease?

Authors:  Bogdan Obrzut; Marzanna Obrzut
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 4.964

9.  Role of laparoscopy in identifying the clinical significance and cause of adhesions and chronic pelvic pain: a retrospective review at the Kiel School of Gynecological Endoscopy.

Authors:  Liselotte Mettler; Maher Alhujeily
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2007 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

10.  Comparison of a chymase inhibitor and hyaluronic acid/carboxymethylcellulose (Seprafilm) in a novel peritoneal adhesion model in rats.

Authors:  Maiko Ozeki; Denan Jin; Yuta Miyaoka; Shinsuke Masubuchi; Fumitoshi Hirokawa; Michihiro Hayashi; Shinji Takai; Kazuhisa Uchiyama
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.