Literature DB >> 7295173

[Criteria for the differential diagnosis of cochlear-retrocochlear disorders with brain stem audiometry (author's transl)].

C Zöllner, H Eibach.   

Abstract

Brain stem audiometry turned out to be a useful tool in the differential diagnosis of cochlear-retrocochlear damage. Reviewing the literature of recent years it becomes clear that various criteria are used to distinguish such lesions when interpreting the brain stem potentials. The most frequently used parameters are: 1. ipsilateral latency of potential V as compared to mean of normal population; 2. difference of latency of potential V of ipsi- and contralateral side; 3. ipsilateral latency difference potentials I -- V as compared to mean of normal population; 4. difference of latency difference potentials I -- V of ipsi- and contralateral side. Evaluating the registrations of brain stem potentials of 50 patients with uni- or bilateral cochlear lesions these parameters had a different degree of liability. Comparing latency differences of potentials I -- V of ipsi- and contralateral sides was the safest method to avoid a false positive diagnosis. It is discussed why this parameter should be the most suitable in the distinction of cochlear and retrocochlear lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7295173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0302-9530


  20 in total

1.  Evoked potential audiometry.

Authors:  T W Picton; D L Woods; J Baribeau-Braun; T M Healey
Journal:  J Otolaryngol       Date:  1976-04

2.  Maturational changes in auditory transmission as reflected in human brain stem potentials.

Authors:  A Salamy; C M McKean; F B Buda
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1975-10-17       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  Human auditory nerve action potentials and brain stem evoked responses: effects of audiogram shape and lesion location.

Authors:  A C Coats; J L Martin
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol       Date:  1977-10

4.  The effect of the click repetition rate on the latency of the auditory evoked brain stem response and its clinical use for a neurological diagnosis.

Authors:  T Yagi; K Kaga
Journal:  Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1979

5.  Clinical and pathologic correlates of brain stem auditory response abnormalities.

Authors:  J J Stockard; V S Rossiter
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1977-04       Impact factor: 9.910

6.  Compound impulse response for the brain stem derived through combinations of cochlear and brain stem recordings.

Authors:  C Elberling
Journal:  Scand Audiol       Date:  1978

7.  Human auditory nerve action potentials and brain stem evoked responses.

Authors:  A C Coats
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol       Date:  1978-12

8.  Brain stem electric response audiometry in the differential diagnosis of acoustic tumors.

Authors:  J D Clemis; T Mc Gee
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  [Electric response audiometry (brain stem potentials and late potential N1) in patients with acoustic neurinoma or space-occupying lesion in the region of the brain stem].

Authors:  C Zöllner; T Karnahl; K Weigel
Journal:  Neurochirurgia (Stuttg)       Date:  1978-11

10.  [Electric response audiometry (brainstem potentials, late auditory potential N1): observations at patients suffering from menière's disease or sudden hearing loss (author's transl)].

Authors:  C Zöllner; T Karnahl
Journal:  Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg)       Date:  1979-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.