Literature DB >> 7290754

Nocebo: the psychologic induction of pain.

A Schweiger, A Parducci.   

Abstract

More than two-thirds of an unselected sample of 34 college students reported mild headaches when told that a (nonexistent) electric current was passing through their heads. These reports appeared independent of whether the instructions emphasized the headache-producing effect of the current or whether the emphasis was on a perceptual task, with headache as only a possible side effect. The results are consistent with a view of pain as localized stress. They provide additional grounds for the suspicion that clinical focusing on pain may itself be a cause of pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7290754     DOI: 10.1007/bf03003218

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pavlov J Biol Sci        ISSN: 0093-2213


  5 in total

1.  Signal detection analyses of social modelling influences on pain expressions.

Authors:  K D Craig; S Coren
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 3.006

2.  Verbal reports of pain without noxious stimulation.

Authors:  K D Craig; S M Weiss
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1972-06

3.  The nature of hypnotic analgesia and placebo response to experimental pain.

Authors:  T H McGlashan; F J Evans; M T Orne
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  1969 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.312

4.  Pain sensitivity and the report of pain: an introduction to sensory decision theory.

Authors:  W C Clark
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  Pain and pain control.

Authors:  M I Weisenberg
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 17.737

  5 in total
  11 in total

1.  [Who likes placebo?].

Authors:  J Lötsch
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  The placebo effect, sleep difficulty, and side effects: a balanced placebo model.

Authors:  Nadine Neukirch; Ben Colagiuri
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2014-08-14

Review 3.  The relation of emotions to placebo responses.

Authors:  Magne Arve Flaten; Per M Aslaksen; Peter S Lyby; Espen Bjørkedal
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Reducing the prevalence of low-back pain by reducing the prevalence of psychological distress: Evidence from a natural experiment and implications for health care providers.

Authors:  Timothy T Brown; Christie Ahn; Haoyue Huang; Zaidat Ibrahim
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 5.  The nocebo effect and its relevance for clinical practice.

Authors:  Luana Colloca; Franklin G Miller
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 4.312

Review 6.  Common coding and dynamic interactions between observed, imagined, and experienced motor and somatosensory activity.

Authors:  Laura K Case; Jaime Pineda; Vilayanur S Ramachandran
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Are some people sensitive to mobile phone signals? Within participants double blind randomised provocation study.

Authors:  G James Rubin; Gareth Hahn; Brian S Everitt; Anthony J Cleare; Simon Wessely
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-03-06

8.  Symptom Presentation in Idiopathic Environmental Intolerance With Attribution to Electromagnetic Fields: Evidence for a Nocebo Effect Based on Data Re-Analyzed From Two Previous Provocation Studies.

Authors:  Stacy Eltiti; Denise Wallace; Riccardo Russo; Elaine Fox
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-08-28

Review 9.  Minimizing nocebo effect: Pragmatic approach.

Authors:  Majed Chamsi-Pasha; Mohammed Ali Albar; Hassan Chamsi-Pasha
Journal:  Avicenna J Med       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec

10.  Nocebo and pain: An overview of the psychoneurobiological mechanisms.

Authors:  Maxie Blasini; Nicole Corsi; Regine Klinger; Luana Colloca
Journal:  Pain Rep       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.