Literature DB >> 7290581

Quantitative evaluation of the electroretinogram.

G van Lith.   

Abstract

The assessment of an electroretinogram (ERG) as normal, abnormal or absent is too imprecise an estimation to inform ophthalmic surgeons about the prospective visual functions. For example, an abnormal or subnormal ERG includes an almost normal as well as an almost absent ERG. Furthermore, whether an ERG is labelled as absent depends on the amplitude of the electrical background activity. A much better information can be provided by expressing the ERG in percentages of the normal value.

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7290581     DOI: 10.1159/000309117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmologica        ISSN: 0030-3755            Impact factor:   3.250


  3 in total

1.  Minimum procedures for visual electrodiagnostic testing.

Authors:  A C Kooijman; D van Norren; P de Sera; J M Thijssen; G L van der Heijde; D Reits; G J van der Wildt; G K Bijl
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1986-01-31       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Relationship between the amplitudes of the b wave and the a wave as a useful index for evaluating the electroretinogram.

Authors:  I Perlman
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  The value of preoperative electro-ophthalmological examination before cataract extraction.

Authors:  H R Vrijland; G H van Lith
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1983-02-28       Impact factor: 2.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.