Literature DB >> 7288026

Temporary threshold shifts produced by wideband noise.

J H Mills, W Y Adkins, R M Gilbert.   

Abstract

Groups of human subjects were exposed in a sound field to a wideband noise for 24 or for 8 h on consecutive days. The wideband noise was composed of octave bands centered at 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz. For the 24-h exposure, temporary threshold shift (TSS) increased for about 8 h and then reached a plateau or asymptote. TTS's at asymptote (ATS) increased about 1.7 dB/dB increase in noise level above about 78 dBA. TTS produced by single-octave band exposures were used to predict the TTS produced by the wideband exposures. Predictions were based on the "Intensity Rule" [W. D. Ward, A. Glorig, and D. L. Sklar, "Temporary threshold shift from octave-band noise: Applications to DRC's," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 31, 522-528 (1959)]. Predictions were acceptably accurate and the validity of the "Intensity Rule" for 24-h exposures or 8-h exposures is supported. There is a remarkable coincidence between the relation which describes ATS and noise level, and the relation which describes noise-induced permanent threshold shift (in industrial workers) and noise level. This coincidence and animal data are used to support the hypothesis that TTS grows to an asymptote rather than a plateau, and that TTS at asymptote (ATS) produced by a given sound is an upper bound on any permanent threshold shift that can be produced by that sound.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7288026     DOI: 10.1121/1.386774

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  8 in total

1.  Digital music exposure reliably induces temporary threshold shift in normal-hearing human subjects.

Authors:  Colleen G Le Prell; Shawna Dell; Brittany Hensley; James W Hall; Kathleen C M Campbell; Patrick J Antonelli; Glenn E Green; James M Miller; Kenneth Guire
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Typical noise exposure in daily life.

Authors:  Gregory A Flamme; Mark R Stephenson; Kristy Deiters; Amanda Tatro; Devon van Gessel; Kyle Geda; Krista Wyllys; Kara McGregor
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.117

3.  Isolated and combined effects of prolonged exposures to noise and whole-body vibration on hearing, vision and strain.

Authors:  H Seidel; B Harazin; K Pavlas; C Sroka; J Richter; R Blüthner; U Erdmann; J Grzesik; B Hinz; R Rothe
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.015

4.  Prolonged noise exposure-induced auditory threshold shifts in rats.

Authors:  Guang-Di Chen; Brandon Decker; Vijaya Prakash Krishnan Muthaiah; Adam Sheppard; Richard Salvi
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  The influence of moderate-intensity noise on the click-evoked compound action potential of the guinea pig, Cavia porcellus.

Authors:  M Walger; U Schmidt; H von Wedel
Journal:  Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1985

6.  Temporary Threshold Shifts among Iron and Steel Factory Workers in Tanzania: A Pre-Interventional Study.

Authors:  Israel P Nyarubeli; Magne Bråtveit; Alexander Mtemi Tungu; Simon H Mamuya; Bente E Moen
Journal:  Ann Glob Health       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 2.462

Review 7.  The use of nonhuman primates in studies of noise injury and treatment.

Authors:  Jane A Burton; Michelle D Valero; Troy A Hackett; Ramnarayan Ramachandran
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.482

Review 8.  Review of environmental factors affecting hearing.

Authors:  J H Mills; J A Going
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 9.031

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.