Literature DB >> 7285409

Unicompartmental knee replacement.

H U Cameron, G A Hunter, R P Welsh, W H Bailey.   

Abstract

The results of unicompartmental knee replacement in a series of 83 knees were reviewed for the period of 1970 to 1978; 30.1 percent achieved good or excellent results; 48.2 percent fair or poor results; 21.7 percent were failures. The vast majority of failures and poor results were due to technical errors. Only 9.6 percent of the nonoperated contralateral compartments required further surgery.

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7285409

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  4 in total

Review 1.  Lateral uni-compartmental knee replacement: current concepts and future directions.

Authors:  E Servien; A Merini; S Lustig; P Neyret
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-07-06       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Lateral unicompartmental knee replacement: a systematic review of reasons for failure.

Authors:  Lukas Ernstbrunner; Mohamed A Imam; Octavian Andronic; Tabea Perz; Karl Wieser; Sandro F Fucentese
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Tibial plateau strength patterns in experimental modular knee replacement.

Authors:  I Hvid; J T Møller
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1985

4.  Lateral unicompartimental knee arthroplasty: indications, technique and short-medium term results.

Authors:  Piero Volpi; Luca Marinoni; Corrado Bait; Marco Galli; Matteo Denti
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-05-12       Impact factor: 4.114

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.