Literature DB >> 7284014

Induction of calcium-ion efflux from brain tissue by radiofrequency radiation: effect of sample number and modulation frequency on the power-density window.

C F Blackman, S G Benane, J A Elder, D E House, J A Lampe, J M Faulk.   

Abstract

Changes have been found in calcium-ion binding to brain tissue exposed in vitro to a specific power density (0.83 mW/cm2) of 147-MHz radiation, amplitude modulated by a 16-Hz sine wave. This report replicates and extends this previous work. To define more precisely the range of effective power densities, two different numbers of samples were treated in a Crawford cell. In one series, four brain tissues were exposed at a time; in the other series, four brain tissues plus six dummy loads were exposed together. While the four-sample configuration produced a narrow power-density window, the ten pseudosample configuration resulted in a broader power-density window. The reason for the sample-number dependence is unresolved, but may be due to interactions between samples and field distortions caused by the close spacing. The ten pseudosample configuration was used to test for the presence and rage of a power-density window at a sinusoidal modulation frequency of 9 Hz. The response curve at 9 Hz was essentially identical to the results for 16-Hz sinewave modulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7284014     DOI: 10.1002/bem.2250010104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics        ISSN: 0197-8462            Impact factor:   2.010


  11 in total

Review 1.  Microwave diathermy.

Authors:  G C Goats
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 13.800

2.  Evaluation of electrical fields inside a biological structure.

Authors:  G P Drago; S Ridella
Journal:  Br J Cancer Suppl       Date:  1982-03

3.  Exposure to GSM RF fields does not affect calcium homeostasis in human endothelial cells, rat pheocromocytoma cells or rat hippocampal neurons.

Authors:  Rodney P O'Connor; Steve D Madison; Philippe Leveque; H Llewelyn Roderick; Martin D Bootman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Tumour-specific amplitude-modulated radiofrequency electromagnetic fields induce differentiation of hepatocellular carcinoma via targeting Cav3.2 T-type voltage-gated calcium channels and Ca2+ influx.

Authors:  Hugo Jimenez; Minghui Wang; Jacquelyn W Zimmerman; Michael J Pennison; Sambad Sharma; Trevor Surratt; Zhi-Xiang Xu; Ivan Brezovich; Devin Absher; Richard M Myers; Barry DeYoung; David L Caudell; Dongquan Chen; Hui-Wen Lo; Hui-Kuan Lin; Dwayne W Godwin; Michael Olivier; Anand Ghanekar; Kui Chen; Lance D Miller; Yijian Gong; Myles Capstick; Ralph B D'Agostino; Reginald Munden; Philippe Merle; Alexandre Barbault; Arthur W Blackstock; Herbert L Bonkovsky; Guang-Yu Yang; Guangxu Jin; Liang Liu; Wei Zhang; Kounosuke Watabe; Carl F Blackman; Boris C Pasche
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 8.143

Review 5.  Pathophysiology of cell phone radiation: oxidative stress and carcinogenesis with focus on male reproductive system.

Authors:  Nisarg R Desai; Kavindra K Kesari; Ashok Agarwal
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2009-10-22       Impact factor: 5.211

6.  Occupational exposure to high-frequency electromagnetic fields and brain tumor risk in the INTEROCC study: An individualized assessment approach.

Authors:  Javier Vila; Michelle C Turner; Esther Gracia-Lavedan; Jordi Figuerola; Joseph D Bowman; Laurel Kincl; Lesley Richardson; Geza Benke; Martine Hours; Daniel Krewski; Dave McLean; Marie-Elise Parent; Siegal Sadetzki; Klaus Schlaefer; Brigitte Schlehofer; Joachim Schüz; Jack Siemiatycki; Martie van Tongeren; Elisabeth Cardis
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2018-07-08       Impact factor: 9.621

7.  Evaluation of specific absorption rate as a dosimetric quantity for electromagnetic fields bioeffects.

Authors:  Dimitris J Panagopoulos; Olle Johansson; George L Carlo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Investigating the Icr Effect in a Zhadin's Cell.

Authors:  L Giuliani; E D'Emilia; S Grimaldi; A Lisi; N Bobkova; M N Zhadin
Journal:  Int J Biomed Sci       Date:  2009-06

Review 9.  Real versus Simulated Mobile Phone Exposures in Experimental Studies.

Authors:  Dimitris J Panagopoulos; Olle Johansson; George L Carlo
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 10.  30 Hz, Could It Be Part of a Window Frequency for Cellular Response?

Authors:  Olga García-Minguillán; Ceferino Maestú
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.