Literature DB >> 7280573

Diagnosis of schizophrenia: a critical review of current diagnostic systems.

W S Fenton, L R Mosher, S M Matthews.   

Abstract

The data relevant to the evaluation of six systems for diagnosing schizophrenia are reviewed. They are summarized in terms of the reliability, predictive validity, specificity, and comprehensiveness of each system. Unfortunately, none, of these systems (Schneider's First-rank Symptoms, New Haven Schizophrenia Index, Flexible System, Feighner Criteria, Research Diagnostic Criteria, and DSM-III) have established construct validity. It is noted therefore that they are all, in a sense, arbitrary. Choosing one over another cannot be data-based. Because the elevation of any one diagnostic system to an official status is thought to be premature, clinicians and researchers alike are advised to exercise caution and openmindedness in their use of DSM-III. There is as yet no evidence that its criteria for schizophrenia are either less arbitrary or better (in identifying a group of "true" schizophrenics) than those of other systems or DSM-II.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7280573     DOI: 10.1093/schbul/7.3.452

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Schizophr Bull        ISSN: 0586-7614            Impact factor:   9.306


  2 in total

1.  Mental health and public health: Strengthening a working relationship.

Authors:  M S Goldstein
Journal:  J Prim Prev       Date:  1989-12

Review 2.  The Evolution of TMD Diagnosis: Past, Present, Future.

Authors:  R Ohrbach; S F Dworkin
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 6.116

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.