Literature DB >> 7279560

The rod-and-frame illusion in erect and supine observers.

D R Goodenough, P K Oltman, E Sigman, P W Cox.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  1981        PMID： 7279560     DOI： 10.3758/bf03207346

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN： 0031-5117


× No keyword cloud information.
  8 in total

1.  Optically induced eye torsion. II. Optostatic and optokinetic cycloversion.

Authors:  R A Crone
Journal:  Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1975-08-04

2.  THE MEASUREMENT OF EYE TORSION.

Authors:  I P HOWARD; J A EVANS
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1963-12       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Orientation contrast effects in the rod-and-frame test.

Authors:  D R Goodenough; P K Oltman; E Sigman; J Rosso; H Mertz
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1979-05

4.  Beware of the straight-ahead shift--a nonperceptual change in experiments on adaptation to displaced vision.

Authors:  C S Harris
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1974       Impact factor: 1.490

5.  The effect of body tilt on the Zöllner illusion.

Authors:  G K Wallace; B Moulden
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1973-02       Impact factor: 2.143

6.  Interactions between orientations in human vision.

Authors:  R H Carpenter; C Blakemore
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1973-10-26       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Eye torsion in response to a tilted visual stimulus.

Authors:  D R Goodenough; E Sigman; P K Oltman; J Rosso; H Mertz
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  State reversals of optically induced tilt and torsional eye movements.

Authors:  R A Finke; R Held
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1978-04
  8 in total
  12 in total

1.  The effect of altered gravity states on the perception of orientation.

Authors:  Richard T Dyde; Michael R Jenkin; Heather L Jenkin; James E Zacher; Laurence R Harris
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-03-21       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Subjective visual vertical in erect/supine subjects and under microgravity: effects of lower body negative pressure.

Authors:  Marco Lucertini; Claudio De Angelis; Marialuisa Martelli; Valfredo Zolesi; Enrico Tomao
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-02-04       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Visual and somesthetic influences on postural orientation in the median plane.

Authors:  K Nemire; M M Cohen
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-01

4.  Spatial orientation: visual-vestibular-somatic interaction.

Authors:  D E Parker; R L Poston; W L Gulledge
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1983-02

5.  A visually induced illusion of body tilt in a horizontal plane.

Authors:  D R Goodenough; A Nowak; P K Oltman; P W Cox; E Sigman
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1982-03

6.  Perception of longitudinal body axis in patients with stroke: a pilot study.

Authors:  J Barra; V Chauvineau; T Ohlmann; M Gresty; D Pérennou
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2006-07-25       Impact factor: 10.154

7.  Combined influence of visual scene and body tilt on arm pointing movements: gravity matters!

Authors:  Cécile Scotto Di Cesare; Fabrice R Sarlegna; Christophe Bourdin; Daniel R Mestre; Lionel Bringoux
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A Bayesian Account of Visual-Vestibular Interactions in the Rod-and-Frame Task.

Authors:  Bart B G T Alberts; Anouk J de Brouwer; Luc P J Selen; W Pieter Medendorp
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2016-11-03

Review 9.  Imaging Posture Veils Neural Signals.

Authors:  Robert T Thibault; Amir Raz
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Mobility may impact attention abilities in healthy term or prematurely born children at 7-years of age: protocol for an intervention controlled trial.

Authors:  Hadrien Ceyte; Joëlle Rosenbaum; Isabelle Hamon; Maëlle Wirth; Sébastien Caudron; Jean-Michel Hascoët
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 2.125
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.