Literature DB >> 7279546

Peripheral movement, induced movement, and aftereffects from induced movement.

A H Reinhardt-Rutland.   

Abstract

Substantial rotatory induced movement and aftereffects associated with induced movement were observed in a large statis patterned disc bounded at its periphery by a rotating patterned annulus. The area of the annulus was less than one tenth that of the disc, so its peripheral location seemed to be important in eliciting these phenomena. This was confirmed in two experiments comparing a peripheral annulus and a relatively central anulus in their ability to elicit induced movement and aftereffects in the same large static field. Aspects of the vection (induced self-movement) phenomenon may have been involved in generation of induced movement. This suggested that the motion-inducing properties of the peripheral annulus might have derived from: (i) its eccentric location in the perceiver's visual field; or (ii) its location with regard to the display itself. Two further experiments showed that (ii) was important for the elicitation of both induced movement and the aftereffects, and (i) was important for the elicitation of induced movement. Neurons responsive to relative movement in conjunction with lateral inhibition may provide a partial explanation for these effects. However, they do not explain why the visual system can assign considerable movement to a large static field under the conditions of these experiments.

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7279546     DOI: 10.1068/p100173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  2 in total

1.  Does intermittence in induced rotary movement have any explanatory significance?

Authors:  A H Reinhardt-Rutland
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-06

2.  The vista paradox: is the effect partly explained by induced movement?

Authors:  A H Reinhardt-Rutland
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.