Literature DB >> 7279168

Cerebrospinal fluid pulse wave form analysis during hypercapnia and hypoxia.

H D Portnoy, M Chopp.   

Abstract

Systems analysis of cerebrospinal fluid pulse wave forms (CSFPWs) was carried out in 19 cats during the inhalation of 5% CO2 + 95% O2. 10% CO2 + 90% O2 and 10% O2 + 90% N2. The results were compared to CSFPWs obtained during the inhalation of 100% O2 and during an intraventricular infusion to the same level of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pressure (CSFP) as produced by the test gas. The systemic arterial pressure pulse was utilized as the system input, and the CSFP pulse was used as the output. The harmonic amplitudes of the two pulses and the amplitude transfer function (XFRa) between the pulses were calculated. Hypercapnia and and hypoxia produced an increase in CSF pulse pressure (delta Pcsf), an increase in primarily the XFRa of the fundamental frequency, and as a result, an increase in amplitude of the fundamental frequency of the CSFPW with rounding of the pulse wave. The changes are greater than those noted during an intraventricular infusion (IVI) to the same level of CSFP. In addition, the volume-pressure test was performed on the hypercapnic animals. The volume-pressure response was less during hypercapnia than during the IVI at the same mean level of CSFP. The result suggest that the increase in deltaP csf is related to cerebral arteriolar vasodilation and not to a steepening of the volume-pressure curve and that rounding of the CSFPW is related to a decrease in cerebrovascular tone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7279168     DOI: 10.1227/00006123-198107000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  14 in total

1.  Intracranial hypertension prediction using extremely randomized decision trees.

Authors:  Fabien Scalzo; Robert Hamilton; Shadnaz Asgari; Sunghan Kim; Xiao Hu
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 2.242

Review 2.  Analysis of intracranial pressure.

Authors:  D J Doyle; P W Mark
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1992-01

3.  Neocortical capillary flow pulsatility is not elevated in experimental communicating hydrocephalus.

Authors:  Shams Rashid; James P McAllister; Yiting Yu; Mark E Wagshul
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 6.200

4.  Pulse amplitude and volume-pressure relationships in experimental hydrocephalus.

Authors:  J M González-Darder; J L Barcia-Salorio
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.216

5.  Changes in intracranial pressure and epidural pulse waveform following cold injury.

Authors:  O Hirai; H Handa; M Ishikawa; S H Kim; S Yoshida
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 2.216

6.  The CSF pulse wave in hydrocephalus.

Authors:  H D Portnoy; C Branch; M Chopp
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.475

7.  Robust peak recognition in intracranial pressure signals.

Authors:  Fabien Scalzo; Shadnaz Asgari; Sunghan Kim; Marvin Bergsneider; Xiao Hu
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 2.819

8.  Morphological clustering and analysis of continuous intracranial pressure.

Authors:  Xiao Hu; Peng Xu; Fabien Scalzo; Paul Vespa; Marvin Bergsneider
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 4.538

9.  Assessment of cerebrovascular resistance with a model of cerebrovascular pressure transmission.

Authors:  Nithya Narayanan; Charles W Leffler; Michael L Daley
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 2.242

10.  Regression analysis for peak designation in pulsatile pressure signals.

Authors:  Fabien Scalzo; Peng Xu; Shadnaz Asgari; Marvin Bergsneider; Xiao Hu
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2009-07-04       Impact factor: 2.602

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.