Literature DB >> 7277203

Selective monitoring of physical sensations.

J W Pennebaker, J A Skelton.   

Abstract

Two experiments demonstrated that the experience of physical sensations is the result of hypothesis-guided selective search and encoding. In the first experiment, subjects listened to a stimulus that was said to increase, decrease, or have no effect on skin temperature. The results indicated that subjects selectively monitored only those changes in skin temperature congruent with the experimentally induced hypotheses, thus resulting in self-reports of change in skin temperature in the suggested directions. Two replications using heart rate and nasal congestion-which imposed search strategies-produced comparable results. In Experiment 2, subjects viewed a heartbeat chart and assessed the degree to which a hypothetical drug influenced a target person's heart rate. Perceptions of change in heart rate were influenced by both experimentally induced hypotheses as well as subjects' perceptions of their own heart rate. That is, if prior to the experiment subjects believed their own pulse was accelerated, they were more likely to perceive the graphed heartbeat accelerating as well. The findings point to parallels between perception of internal state and the external environment. Finally, the roles of hypothesis-guided selective search are extended to placebo effectiveness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7277203     DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.41.2.213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  12 in total

1.  Measuring life event stress in the lives of college students: the Undergraduate Stress Questionnaire (USQ).

Authors:  C S Crandall; J J Preisler; J Aussprung
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1992-12

2.  Expectations and placebo response: a laboratory investigation into the role of somatic focus.

Authors:  Andrew L Geers; Suzanne G Helfer; Paul E Weiland; Kristin Kosbab
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2005-12-23

3.  Placebo expectations and the detection of somatic information.

Authors:  Andrew L Geers; Justin A Wellman; Stephanie L Fowler; Heather M Rasinski; Suzanne G Helfer
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2010-11-03

4.  Current perspectives on symptom perception in asthma: a biomedical and psychological review.

Authors:  S Rietveld; J F Brosschot
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  1999

5.  To tell the truth, the whole truth, may do patients harm: the problem of the nocebo effect for informed consent.

Authors:  Rebecca Erwin Wells; Ted J Kaptchuk
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 11.229

6.  A Bayesian account of 'hysteria'.

Authors:  Mark J Edwards; Rick A Adams; Harriet Brown; Isabel Pareés; Karl J Friston
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2012-05-28       Impact factor: 13.501

7.  The Link between Health Complaints and Wind Turbines: Support for the Nocebo Expectations Hypothesis.

Authors:  Fiona Crichton; Simon Chapman; Tim Cundy; Keith J Petrie
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2014-11-11

8.  Prevalent hallucinations during medical internships: phantom vibration and ringing syndromes.

Authors:  Yu-Hsuan Lin; Sheng-Hsuan Lin; Peng Li; Wei-Lieh Huang; Ching-Yen Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Minimal self-models and the free energy principle.

Authors:  Jakub Limanowski; Felix Blankenburg
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  The nocebo effect of drugs.

Authors:  Sara Planès; Céline Villier; Michel Mallaret
Journal:  Pharmacol Res Perspect       Date:  2016-03-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.