Literature DB >> 7271435

[The potential of psychopathological symptoms to differentiate diagnostic groups (author's transl)].

A Pietzcker, R Gebhardt, K Freudenthal, C Langer.   

Abstract

We investigated the extent psychiatric illnesses can be differentiated by means of psychopathological symptoms. The present condition of 2269 patients was analyzed; they had been admitted to the psychiatric clinic of the Free University of Berlin during 1971-1976, as documented by the AMP (PAS) documentation system. The most frequent diagnosis in the sample was schizophrenia (32%), followed by neurosis (22%), affective psychosis (14%), addiction (6.7%), and organic psychosis (6.2%). We could demonstrate that even such diagnostic groups are usually discernible by symptoms, where the differential diagnosis is often difficult. Organic psychosis vs paranoid schizophrenia and depressive neurosis vs depressive psychosis can be determined, but manic syndromes in schizoaffective psychosis vs manic syndromes in affective psychosis are hardly discernible. The potential to differentiate, however, only pertains to diagnostic groups, since many individual patients cannot accurately be classified into diagnostic groups by psychopathological symptoms alone. Only a few symptoms are pathognomonic, and if there are pathogomonic symptoms characterizing a diagnostic group, only a few patients in this group show these symptoms. These results indicate, at least for the high number of patients without severe and typical symptomatology, that we must: 1. Achieve better differentiation on the diagnostic axis "psychopathology" by means of empirically derived syndromes instead of isolated symptoms. 2. Use other diagnostic axes (like etiology and course) for differential diagnostic purposes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7271435     DOI: 10.1007/BF00345174

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Psychiatr Nervenkr (1970)


  13 in total

1.  [Studies with the AMP system: comparison of symptoms from Berlin and Zürich].

Authors:  U Baumann; G Scheidewind; J Angst; H Helmchen; H Hippius
Journal:  Arzneimittelforschung       Date:  1976

2.  [A nosologic-diagnostic comparison of analytically determined cluster groups aided by AMP-documented psychopathologic findings (author's transl)].

Authors:  A Pietzcker; R Gebhardt; K Freudenthal
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 1.214

3.  The classification of depressions: a review of contemporary confusion.

Authors:  R E Kendell
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 9.319

4.  [Comparison of k therapies after determination of success and failure].

Authors:  R Gebhardt; G A Lienert
Journal:  Z Klin Psychol Psychother       Date:  1978

5.  Schizo-affective psychosis: definitions and incidence.

Authors:  I F Brockington; J P Leff
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 7.723

6.  [Frequency of symptoms in psychiatric illnesses. A comparative investigation with two rating scales (IMPS and AMP-scale)--psychological-pathological findings (author's transl)].

Authors:  W Mombour
Journal:  Arch Psychiatr Nervenkr (1970)       Date:  1974

7.  [Syndromes in psychiatric illnesses. A comparative investigation with two rating scales (IMPS and AMP-scale) (author's transl)].

Authors:  W Mombour
Journal:  Arch Psychiatr Nervenkr (1970)       Date:  1974

8.  Do psychiatric patients fit their diagnoses? Patterns of symptomatology as described with the biplot.

Authors:  J S Strauss; K R Gabriel; R F Kokes; B A Ritzler; A VanOrd; E Tarana
Journal:  J Nerv Ment Dis       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 2.254

9.  AMP (PAS) and BPRS: a comparison of two assessment methods.

Authors:  K Freudenthal; R Gebhardt; A Pietzcher
Journal:  Pharmakopsychiatr Neuropsychopharmakol       Date:  1977-03

10.  "Schizoaffective disorder": an invalid diagnosis? A comparison of schizoaffective disorder, schizophrenia, and affective disorder.

Authors:  H G Pope; J F Lipinski; B M Cohen; D T Axelrod
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 18.112

View more
  5 in total

1.  [Validity of the syndrome scales in the AMDP-system].

Authors:  R Gebhardt; A Pietzcker
Journal:  Arch Psychiatr Nervenkr (1970)       Date:  1983

2.  [A statistical comparison of the different factor analyses of the AMP-system (author's transl)].

Authors:  A Pietzcker; R Gebhardt; K Freudenthal; C Langer
Journal:  Arch Psychiatr Nervenkr (1970)       Date:  1982

3.  [Building syndromes in the AMP-system (author's transl)].

Authors:  R Gebhardt; A Pietzcker; K Freudenthal; C Langer
Journal:  Arch Psychiatr Nervenkr (1970)       Date:  1981

4.  [Organic schizophreniform disorder with pre-existing autoimmune thyroiditis].

Authors:  E Gruber; C Algermissen; H Ebel
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 5.  Systematic of psychiatric disorders between categorical and dimensional approaches: Kraepelin's dichotomy and beyond.

Authors:  Hans-Jürgen Möller
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 5.270

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.