Literature DB >> 7270690

Human esophageal response to rapid swallowing: muscle refractory period or neural inhibition?

G W Meyer, D C Gerhardt, D O Castell.   

Abstract

The peristaltic response of the normal human esophagus to 10 repeated water swallows separated by varying time intervals (5, 10, 15, 20, and 30 s) between swallows was studied. Pressures measured during the shorter time intervals were of lower amplitude than those at 30-s swallowing intervals throughout the esophagus, with the distal esophagus showing the greatest effect. Frequency of peristalsis was decreased throughout the esophagus with rapid swallowing, especially distally at the 5- and 10-s time intervals. There was no significant change in wave velocity or duration at these time intervals. These data suggest that there is a refractory period in the distal (smooth muscle) esophagus. A series of paired swallows separated by 5 s resulted in a significant decrease in amplitude of the first swallow, and this was more marked in the distal esophagus. These data indicate that there is an inhibition of the progression of peristalsis by a subsequent swallow, probably through a neural mechanism. These studies show that repeated liquid swallows may effect peristalsis by two mechanisms: refractoriness of esophageal smooth muscle and a neural inhibitory discharge.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7270690     DOI: 10.1152/ajpgi.1981.241.2.G129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol        ISSN: 0002-9513


  28 in total

Review 1.  Oesophageal motor functions and its disorders.

Authors:  R K Mittal; V Bhalla
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Solid swallowing versus water swallowing: manometric study of dysphagia.

Authors:  S Keren; E Argaman; M Golan
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Systematic comparison of conventional oesophageal manometry with oesophageal motility while eating bread.

Authors:  P J Howard; L Maher; A Pryde; R C Heading
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Manometric patterns using esophageal body and lower sphincter characteristics. Findings in 1013 patients.

Authors:  R E Clouse; A Staiano
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 5.  Brain stem control of the phases of swallowing.

Authors:  Ivan M Lang
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 3.438

Review 6.  What Is the Impact of High-Resolution Manometry in the Functional Diagnostic Workup of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease?

Authors:  Jutta Keller
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2018-04-12

7.  Modulation of esophageal peristalsis by alterations of body position. Effect of bolus viscosity.

Authors:  C P Dooley; B Schlossmacher; J E Valenzuela
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Accuracy of abbreviated manometry in detecting esophageal motility abnormalities.

Authors:  R E Clouse; L B Weinstock; D M Ferney
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Recurrent autonomous esophageal peristalsis in patients with chest discomfort.

Authors:  T E Nixon; K L Koch
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Habitual rapid food intake and ineffective esophageal motility.

Authors:  Kong-Ling Li; Ji-Hong Chen; Qian Zhang; Jan D Huizinga; Shawn Vadakepeedika; Yu-Rong Zhao; Wen-Zhen Yu; He-Sheng Luo
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.