Literature DB >> 7261710

Topographic examination of sister chromatid differential staining by Nomarski interference microscopy and scanning electron microscopy.

S Takayama, K R Utsumi, Y Sasaki.   

Abstract

BrdU-substituted Chinese hamster chromosomes were treated with a hog Na2HPO4 solution and stained with Giemsa to produce sister chromatid differential staining (SCD). The process of SCD was examined with the Nomarski differential interference microscope and the scanning electron microscope. After the Na2HPO4 treatment alone, unifilarly BrdU-substituted (TB) chromatids appeared somewhat more severely collapsed than the bifilarly substituted (BB) chromatids. Subsequent Giemsa staining, however, brought about pronounced piling up of the Giemsa dye on the TB-chromatids but not on the BB-ones, causing highly distinct differential Giemsa staining as well as a marked differentiation in surface topography between the sister chromatids. Removal of the Giemsa dye from the differentially Giemsa stained chromosomes resulted in a disappearance of such a pronounced topographic differentiation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7261710     DOI: 10.1007/BF00285754

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosoma        ISSN: 0009-5915            Impact factor:   4.316


  12 in total

1.  Sister chromatid differential staining by direct staining in Na2HPO4-Giemsa solution and the mechanism involved.

Authors:  S Takayama; S I Sakanishi
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1979-10-02       Impact factor: 4.316

2.  New Giemsa method for the differential staining of sister chromatids.

Authors:  P Perry; S Wolff
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1974-09-13       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Mechanisms involved in the banding of chromosomes with guinacrine and Giems. II. The interaction of the dyes with the chromosomal components.

Authors:  A T Sumner; H J Evans
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 3.905

4.  Microfluorometric detection of deoxyribonucleic acid replication in human metaphase chromosomes.

Authors:  S A Latt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1973-12       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Autoradiographic evidence of differential loss of BUdR-substituted DNA after uv exposure in FPG harlequin staining.

Authors:  C H Ockey
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 3.905

6.  Two opposite types of sister chromatid differential staining in BUdR-substituted chromosomes using tetrasodium salt of EDTA.

Authors:  S Takayama; K Tachibana
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 3.905

7.  An investigation of the mechanism of the reciprocal differential staining of BUdR-substituted and unsubstituted chromosome regions.

Authors:  G D Burkholder
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 3.905

8.  Giemsa technique for the detection of sister chromatid exchanges.

Authors:  J R Korenberg; E F Freedlender
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1974       Impact factor: 4.316

9.  Involvement of sulfhydryl groups of chromosomal proteins in sister chromatid differentiation.

Authors:  C H Buys; S Stienstra
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 4.316

10.  Electron microscopy of differentially BrdU-substituted sister chromatids treated with sodium phosphate.

Authors:  G D Burkholder; H C Wang
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1978-12-21       Impact factor: 4.316

View more
  2 in total

1.  Scanning electron microscopy of Giemsa-stained chromosomes and surface-spread chromosomes.

Authors:  K R Utsumi
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 4.316

2.  Effects of bromodeoxyuridine substitution on metaphase chromosome structures examined by scanning electron microscopy.

Authors:  T Taniguchi; S Takayama
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.316

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.