Literature DB >> 7248439

A new approach to the analysis of clinical drug trials with withdrawals.

A L Gould.   

Abstract

In clinical drug trials which require observation of patients for more than a few days or weeks, some patients may withdraw before completing the planned course of the trial for reasons that are related to the therapy, for example adverse experiences or lack of therapeutic effect. If the number of such withdrawals is material, then analysis of the data from these trials should account for these withdrawals. Ignoring them in the analyses or using the last recorded value before withdrawl can lead to misleading conclusions. If the response outcomes can be ordered so that, for instance, adverse withdrawals can be regarded as "bad" outcomes, then the withdrawals can be incorporated into the analyses straightforwardly. The method is described and illustrated, and several issues arising in its application are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7248439

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  10 in total

1.  Power and sample size calculations for the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test in the presence of death-censored observations.

Authors:  Roland A Matsouaka; Rebecca A Betensky
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Efficacy and tolerability of a topical NSAID patch (local action transcutaneous flurbiprofen) and oral diclofenac in the treatment of soft-tissue rheumatism.

Authors:  M Martens
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 2.980

3.  A double blind comparative study of sulphasalazine and hydroxychloroquine in rheumatoid arthritis: evidence of an earlier effect of sulphasalazine.

Authors:  I H Nuver-Zwart; P L van Riel; L B van de Putte; F W Gribnau
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 4.  Fosinopril. A review of its pharmacology and clinical efficacy in the management of heart failure.

Authors:  R Davis; A Coukell; D McTavish
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Measurement in clinical trials.

Authors:  D M Chaput de Saintonge; D W Vere
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  Multicentre randomised controlled trial of nursing intervention for breathlessness in patients with lung cancer.

Authors:  M Bredin; J Corner; M Krishnasamy; H Plant; C Bailey; R A'Hern
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-04-03

7.  Intention to treat--who should use ITT?

Authors:  J A Lewis; D Machin
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Problems in dealing with missing data and informative censoring in clinical trials.

Authors:  Weichung Shih
Journal:  Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2002-01-08

9.  Imputation methods for missing outcome data in meta-analysis of clinical trials.

Authors:  Julian P T Higgins; Ian R White; Angela M Wood
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.486

10.  Study protocol of SWEPIS a Swedish multicentre register based randomised controlled trial to compare induction of labour at 41 completed gestational weeks versus expectant management and induction at 42 completed gestational weeks.

Authors:  Helen Elden; Henrik Hagberg; Anna Wessberg; Verena Sengpiel; Andreas Herbst; Maria Bullarbo; Christina Bergh; Kristian Bolin; Snezana Malbasic; Sissel Saltvedt; Olof Stephansson; Anna-Karin Wikström; Lars Ladfors; Ulla-Britt Wennerholm
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 3.007

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.