Literature DB >> 7246834

Quality assessment by process and outcome methods: evaluation of emergency room care of asthmatic adults.

S Mates, V W Sidel.   

Abstract

Weighted process criteria based on chart review and weighted outcome criteria based on telephone interview were used to assess the quality of care for adult patients with asthma in the emergency rooms of a municipal and a voluntary hospital which share medical personnel. Process scores were highly correlated with 24-hour outcome scores at both hospitals but not with 7-day outcome scores. Our findings suggest that appropriate weighted process and outcome criteria are valid and useful methods for quality assessment, and underline the importance of choice of an appropriate "time window" for assessment of outcome. In addition, these assessment methods provide important "feedback" information for those providing care in the emergency room. (Am J Public Health 1981;71:687-693)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7246834      PMCID: PMC1619775          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.71.7.687

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  10 in total

1.  Priority setting in quality assurance: reliability of staff judgments in medical institutions.

Authors:  J W Williamson; H R Braswell; S D Horn; S Lohmeyer
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Rapid prediction of need for hospitalization in acute asthma.

Authors:  A S Banner; R S Shah; W W Addington
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1976-03-29       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 3.  Studies of process--outcome correlations in medical care evaluations: a critique.

Authors:  W E McAuliffe
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Validity of medical staff judgments in establishing quality assurance priorities.

Authors:  J W Williamson; H R Braswell; S D Horn
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1979-04       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  The quality of physicians' health-care performance. A comparison against optimal criteria for treatment of the elderly and younger adults in community hospitals.

Authors:  T F Lyons; B C Payne
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1974-02-25       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  The quality of medical care.

Authors:  A Donabedian
Journal:  Science       Date:  1978-05-26       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Peer review in ambulatory care: use of explicit criteria and implicit judgments.

Authors:  B S Hulka; F J Romm; G R Parkerson; I T Russell; N E Clapp; F S Johnson
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Testing an outcome-based quality assurance strategy in primary care.

Authors:  A I Mushlin; F A Appel
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Quality assessment in hypertension: analysis of process and outcome methods.

Authors:  F T Nobrega; G W Morrow; R K Smoldt; K P Offord
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1977-01-20       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Quality-of-care assessment by process and outcome scoring. Use of weighted algorithmic assessment criteria for evaluation of emergency room care of women with symptoms of urinary tract infection.

Authors:  L Rubenstein; S Mates; V W Sidel
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 25.391

  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  Development of explicit criteria to measure adherence to hypertension guidelines.

Authors:  J L Milchak; B L Carter; G Ardery; H R Black; G L Bakris; D W Jones; C D Kreiter
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.012

2.  Resource requirements for evaluating ambulatory health care.

Authors:  M S Thompson; R H Palmer; J K Rothrock; R Strain; L H Brachman; E A Wright
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Quality of care assessment: its role in the 1980s.

Authors:  R H Brook; K N Lohr
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 9.308

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.