Literature DB >> 7242138

Use of silicone rubber as a pericardial substitute to facilitate reoperation in cardiac surgery.

H Laks, G Hammond, A S Geha.   

Abstract

Reoperations following cardiac procedures have an increased risk because of the danger of damaging the heart, great vessels, or grafts because of adhesions to the sternum and anterior chest wall. We report our experience with the use of silicone rubber as a pericardial substitute in 102 patients--58 children undergoing palliative and corrective operations and 44 adults undergoing porcine valve insertion or coronary revascularization. The pericardial substitute was used only in cases in which reoperation was considered likely. There were no mediastinal infections. One adult had signs of cardiac constriction which improved markedly on administration of anti-inflammatory agents. Seven patients required reoperation for bleeding. Two patients who underwent Fontan procedures developed pericardial effusions necessitating a pericardial window. Reoperation was undertaken 1 to 12 months postoperatively in seven patients, all of whom were children. The silicon rubber greatly facilitated opening of the chest bone but did not affect the formation of adhesions within the pericardium. Postmortem examinations have been obtained in two cases 5 and 9 months postoperatively, and showed a thin layer of dense fibrous tissue adjacent to the silicone rubber. We conclude that silicone rubber may be used as a pericardial substitute and that it facilitates reoperation following cardiac operations. Particular caution should be used in patients undergoing Fontan procedures, as there appears to be a tendency for pericardial effusions and tamponade to develop.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7242138

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  6 in total

Review 1.  Bioengineered tissue solutions for repair, correction and reconstruction in cardiovascular surgery.

Authors:  Laura Iop; Tiziana Palmosi; Eleonora Dal Sasso; Gino Gerosa
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Transvenous double-balloon occlusion of the persistent ductus arteriosus: an experimental study.

Authors:  I Warnecke; J Frank; R Hohle; W Lemm; E S Bücherl
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  1984 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.655

3.  Use of polytetrafluoroethylene surgical membrane as a pericardial substitute in the correction of congenital heart defects.

Authors:  M Loebe; V Alexi-Meskhishvili; Y Weng; G Hausdorf; R Hetzer
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  1993

4.  Cardiac cryolesions as an experimental model of myocardial wound healing.

Authors:  J A Jensen; J C Kosek; T K Hunt; W H Goodson; D C Miller
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Reconstruction of the pericardial sac with glutaraldehyde-preserved bovine pericardium.

Authors:  V S Yakirevich; S A Abdulali; C R Abbott; M I Ionescu
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  1984-09

6.  Bioresorbable adhesion barrier for reducing the severity of postoperative cardiac adhesions: Focus on REPEL-CV(®).

Authors:  Martin Haensig; Friedrich Wilhelm Mohr; Ardawan Julian Rastan
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2011-01-12
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.