Literature DB >> 7237915

How should adenoidal enlargement be measured? A radiological study based on interobserver agreement.

W D Jeans, D C Fernando, A R Maw.   

Abstract

Clinical assessment of adenoidal size is difficult, and an objective measurement is desirable. To establish the best radiological method, lateral cephalometric radiographs were taken of 38 children three days before their adenoids were removed. Two radiologists each made five measurements related to adenoidal size on ech radiograph, and the correlations between the radiological measurements and between the measurements and the volume of tissue removed at operation were calculated. Linear measurement of the palatal airway at the narrowest point between the outlines of the adenoid and soft palate is the simplest method to use and shows good correlation between observers. It is recommended for clinical use. Measurement of the nasopharyngeal soft tissue area show equally good observer correlation and better correlation with the volume of adenoid removed at operation. This method appears more suitable for longitudinal studies of adenoidal size.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7237915     DOI: 10.1016/s0009-9260(81)80060-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Radiol        ISSN: 0009-9260            Impact factor:   2.350


  9 in total

1.  A suggested clinical score to predict the severity of adenoid obstruction in children.

Authors:  Mohamed A Bitar; Amal Rahi; Mostapha Khalifeh; Laura-Maria S Madanat
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2006-06-24       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  X-Rays in the evaluation of adenoid hypertrophy: It's role in the endoscopic era.

Authors:  Mary Kurien; Anjali Lepcha; John Mathew; Arif Ali; L Jeyaseelan
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2005-01

3.  Chronic adenoid hypertrophy in children - is steroid nasal spray beneficial?

Authors:  Anjali Lepcha; Mary Kurien; Anand Job; L Jeyaseelan; Kurien Thomas
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2002-10

4.  Reliability of subjective, linear, ratio and area cephalometric measurements in assessing adenoid hypertrophy among different age groups.

Authors:  Marcelo Quiroga Souki; Bernardo Quiroga Souki; Letícia Paiva Franco; Helena Maria Gonçalves Becker; Eustáquio Afonso Araújo
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Validity of upper airway assessment in children: a clinical, cephalometric, and MRI study.

Authors:  Kirsi Pirilä-Parkkinen; Heikki Löppönen; Peter Nieminen; Uolevi Tolonen; Eija Pääkkö; Pertti Pirttiniemi
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Three-dimensional analysis of pharyngeal airway form in children with anteroposterior facial patterns.

Authors:  Kyung-Min Oh; Ji-Suk Hong; Yoon-Ji Kim; Lucia S H Cevidanes; Yang-Ho Park
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Lateral cephalometric radiograph versus lateral nasopharyngeal radiograph for quantitative evaluation of nasopharyngeal airway space.

Authors:  Suelen Cristina da Costa Pereira; Rejane Targino Soares Beltrão; Guilherme Janson; Daniela Gamba Garib
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug

8.  Comparison between radiological and nasopharyngolaryngoscopic assessment of adenoid tissue volume in mouth breathing children.

Authors:  Edmir Américo Lourenço; Karen de Carvalho Lopes; Alvaro Pontes; Marcelo Henrique de Oliveira; Adriana Umemura; Ana Laura Vargas
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2006-01-02

9.  Reliability of radiographic parameters in adenoid evaluation.

Authors:  Murilo Fernando Neuppmann Feres; Helder Inocêncio Paulo de Sousa; Sheila Márcia Francisco; Shirley Shizue Nagata Pignatari
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.