Literature DB >> 7235066

Preliminary findings on psychiatric patients as research participants: a population at risk?

B Stanley, M Stanley, A Lautin, J Kane, N Schwartz.   

Abstract

To determine whether hospitalized mentally ill patients expose themselves to research with high risks more often than hospitalized nonpsychiatric patients, the authors asked patients from both groups if they would be willing to participate in a series of hypothetical research studies. The mentally ill patients did not agree to participate in studies of either high or low risk more frequently than nonpsychiatric patients. Both groups tended to agree to low-risk/high-benefit studies more often than high-risk/low-benefit studies. Although Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale scores clearly differentiated between psychiatric and nonpsychiatric patients, psychopathology did not correlate with willingness to participate in any of the studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7235066     DOI: 10.1176/ajp.138.5.669

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Psychiatry        ISSN: 0002-953X            Impact factor:   18.112


  11 in total

Review 1.  Early intervention in schizophrenia: three frameworks for guiding ethical inquiry.

Authors:  Philip J Candilis
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2003-03-25       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Ethical concerns in schizophrenia research: looking back and moving forward.

Authors:  Scott T Wilson; Barbara Stanley
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2005-11-10       Impact factor: 9.306

3.  Willingness of subjects with thought disorder to participate in research.

Authors:  Philip J Candilis; Cynthia M A Geppert; Kenneth E Fletcher; Charles W Lidz; Paul S Appelbaum
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2005-10-27       Impact factor: 9.306

Review 4.  Emerging empirical evidence on the ethics of schizophrenia research.

Authors:  Laura B Dunn; Philip J Candilis; Laura Weiss Roberts
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 9.306

5.  A direct comparison of research decision-making capacity: schizophrenia/schizoaffective, medically ill, and non-ill subjects.

Authors:  Philip J Candilis; Kenneth E Fletcher; Cynthia M A Geppert; Charles W Lidz; Paul S Appelbaum
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  Psychiatric outpatients report their experiences as participants in a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  M P Carey; D Morrison-Beedy; K B Carey; S A Maisto; C M Gordon; C T Pedlow
Journal:  J Nerv Ment Dis       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.254

7.  Do psychiatric patients need greater protection than medical patients when they consent to treatment?

Authors:  F Cournos
Journal:  Psychiatr Q       Date:  1993

8.  Accept or refuse? A pilot study of patients' perspective on participating as imaginary research subjects in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Jin Hun Kim; Daeho Kim; Sung-Hyouk Park; Junghyun Nam
Journal:  Psychiatry Investig       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 2.505

9.  Informed consent in psychiatry clinical research: A conceptual review of issues, challenges, and recommendations.

Authors:  Umesh Chandra Gupta; Saifuddin Kharawala
Journal:  Perspect Clin Res       Date:  2012-01

Review 10.  Research risk for persons with psychiatric disorders: a decisional framework to meet the ethical challenge.

Authors:  Philip T Yanos; Barbara S Stanley; Carolyn S Greene
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.