Literature DB >> 7232737

Ultrasound mammography: a comparison with radiographic mammography.

C Cole-Beuglet, B B Goldberg, A B Kurtz, C S Rubin, A S Patchefsky, G S Shaber.   

Abstract

The results of 1,029 ultrasound B-scan examinations of the breast using two automated water-path scanners were correlated with histopathology data in 278 patients who had undergone biopsy. Of the 1,029 patients, a subgroup of 709 patients had both ultrasound mammograms (USM) and radiographic mammograms (XRM) obtained. A sensitivity for breast cancer of 69% was found for USM and 74% for XRM on initial independent readings when there was no knowledge of clinical data. These are not statistically different using the McNemar test for paired comparisons. When the USM were reinterpreted with the knowledge of the patient's age, history, physical examination, and, when available, the XRM interpretation, the USM sensitivity for breast cancer was 79%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7232737     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.139.3.7232737

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  3 in total

1.  Radiologic case. Fibroadenoma of the breast.

Authors:  T Myers; C J Stegman; J K Crowe; J M Levy
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1989-07

2.  A comparison between ultrasonography and mammography, computed tomography and digital subtraction angiography for the detection of breast cancers.

Authors:  N Tohnosu; K Okuyama; Y Koide; T Kikuchi; T Awano; H Matsubara; T Sano; H Nakaichi; Y Funami; K Matsushita
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Clinically and mammographically occult breast lesions demonstrated by ultrasound.

Authors:  H M Fung; F I Jackson
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 18.000

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.