Literature DB >> 7229127

The pontocerebellar system in the rat: an HRP study. I. Posterior vermis.

S A Azizi, G A Mihailoff, R A Burne, D J Woodward.   

Abstract

This study was undertaken to determine the origin of projections from the basilar pontine nuclei (BPN) and nucleus reticularis tegmentis pontis (NRTP) to the posterior vermal lobules VI-IX of the rat cerebellum. We describe the topographical organization of this component of the pontocerebellar projection, and the congruence of the cells of origin in the basilar pons with some of the major pontine afferent systems including the corticopontine and tectopontine projections. Horseradish peroxidase (HRP) was injected into the midline cerebellar vermal zones of Long-Evans hooded rats. The more sensitive chromogens, tetramethyl benzidine and benzidine dihydrochloride, were used to reveal the location of labeled neurons. With injections located near the midline, groups of labeled cells were observed bilaterally within the BPN. The basic trend of the projections noted was: lobule VIa receives a nonfocal projection from nearly all subdivisions of the BPN throughout its rostrocaudal extent, as well as a substantial input from NRTP. Lobules VIb-c receive input from NRTP, the rostral pons, and from the ventral, lateral, and medial groups of cells in the middle BPN project to lobule VII, in addition to projections from limited groups of cells in the rostral BPN. Lobule VIII receives afferents from the caudal aspect of the pontine gray. Lobules IXa-receive afferents from the medial and peduncular groups in the midline BPN, whereas lobule IXc receives inputs from a medial group and a small lateral cluster of cells in the caudal aspect of the BPN. Pontine neurons projecting to the posterior vermis originate from areas which appear to receive descending inputs from visual, auditory, and somatosensory regions of the cerebral cortex. However, a large number of pontine and NRTP neurons projecting to lobules VI and VII are located within the terminal fields of tectal neurons, perhaps indicating a stronger input from the tectum rather than visual and auditory cerebral cortical regions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7229127     DOI: 10.1002/cne.901970402

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Neurol        ISSN: 0021-9967            Impact factor:   3.215


  14 in total

1.  Somatosensory properties of cuneocerebellar neurones in the main cuneate nucleus of the rat.

Authors:  Nadia L Cerminara; Kalyanee Makarabhirom; John A Rawson
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 2.  The cerebellum in feeding control: possible function and mechanism.

Authors:  Jing-Ning Zhu; Jian-Jun Wang
Journal:  Cell Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 5.046

3.  GAD-immunoreactive neural elements in the basilar pontine nuclei and nucleus reticularis tegmenti pontis of the rat. I. Light microscopic studies.

Authors:  B G Border; G A Mihailoff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Tinnitus and hyperacusis: Contributions of paraflocculus, reticular formation and stress.

Authors:  Yu-Chen Chen; Guang-Di Chen; Benjamin D Auerbach; Senthilvelan Manohar; Kelly Radziwon; Richard Salvi
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Visual cortical projections to the paraflocculus in the rat. An electrophysiologic study.

Authors:  R A Burne; D J Woodward
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Collapsin-1/semaphorin-III/D is regulated developmentally in Purkinje cells and collapses pontocerebellar mossy fiber neuronal growth cones.

Authors:  S A Rabacchi; J M Solowska; B Kruk; Y Luo; J A Raper; D H Baird
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Cerebellar abnormalities following hypoxia alone compared to hypoxic-ischemic forebrain injury in the developing rat brain.

Authors:  Valerie Biran; Vivi M Heine; Catherine Verney; R Ann Sheldon; Ruggero Spadafora; Zinaida S Vexler; David H Rowitch; Donna M Ferriero
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 5.996

8.  The auditory corticopontocerebellar projection in the rat: inputs to the paraflocculus and midvermis. An anatomical and physiological study.

Authors:  S A Azizi; R A Burne; D J Woodward
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  The influence of the auditory cortex on acoustically evoked cerebellar responses in the CF-FM bat, Rhinolophus pearsonic chinesis.

Authors:  D X Sun; X D Sun; P H Jen
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  Distinct cerebellar contributions to intrinsic connectivity networks.

Authors:  Christophe Habas; Nirav Kamdar; Daniel Nguyen; Katherine Prater; Christian F Beckmann; Vinod Menon; Michael D Greicius
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.