Literature DB >> 7221547

A photobiological evaluation of tanning booths.

D S Nachtwey, R D Rundel.   

Abstract

The use of tanning booths as a substitute for natural sunlight is becoming increasingly popular. However, unless careful attention is paid to proper design and maintenance, the radiation field inside a tanning booth can be highly anisotropic. The use of simple, inexpensive ultraviolet radiation meters to measure dosage can lead to serious overexposure. Since the ultraviolet radiation inside a tanning booth has a greater proportion of short wavelengths (less than 300 nanometers) than natural sunlight, the amount of skin cancer-inducing radiation received for a tan may be twice that received for a natural suntan.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7221547     DOI: 10.1126/science.7221547

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  2 in total

1.  Incidence of male genital skin tumors: lack of increase in the United States.

Authors:  M J Goldoft; N S Weiss
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 2.506

2.  Fluorescent lights, ultraviolet lamps, and risk of cutaneous melanoma.

Authors:  A J Swerdlow; J S English; R M MacKie; C J O'Doherty; J A Hunter; J Clark; D J Hole
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1988-09-10
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.