Literature DB >> 7218069

Gratings: why frequency discrimination is sometimes better than detection.

L A Olzak, J P Thomas.   

Abstract

Two models that assume independent processing among frequency-selective analyzers are presented. These are a distance model and an integration model derived from signal-detection theory. The models permit quantitative comparisons between detection and discrimination performance and lead to an empirical comparison that is sensitive to effects of correlated noise and interactions among the responding mechanisms. The stimuli were four pairs of sine-wave gratings that differed in spatial-frequency separation. They were presented to observers in a signal-detection rating paradigm, which was used for both detection and discrimination judgments. The results indicate the presence of properties, such as inhibitory interactions or correlated noise among responding mechanisms, that favor discrimination over detection.

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7218069     DOI: 10.1364/josa.71.000064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Opt Soc Am        ISSN: 0030-3941


  3 in total

1.  Spatial covert attention increases contrast sensitivity across the CSF: support for signal enhancement.

Authors:  M Carrasco; C Penpeci-Talgar; M Eckstein
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Contextual effects on fine orientation discrimination tasks.

Authors:  Stephanie A Saylor; Lynn A Olzak
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-05-02       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Distinguishing bias from sensitivity effects in multialternative detection tasks.

Authors:  Devarajan Sridharan; Nicholas A Steinmetz; Tirin Moore; Eric I Knudsen
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 2.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.