Literature DB >> 7217956

Estimation of the brain and spinal cord conduction time in man by means of the somatosensory evoked potentials and F and H responses.

J Siivola.   

Abstract

Somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) recordings from the scalp were performed in 17 healthy subjects. In seven of these SSEP was also recorded at the level of the second lumbar spine. In the other ten F and H responses and the corresponding M responses were studied. By means of the SSEP recordings at the level of the second lumbar spine and the F- and H-responses, the conduction time in the brain and spinal cord, that is central latency, was calculated and the following results were obtained: 16.0 ms with standard deviation (SD) +/- 1.1 ms (by means of SSEPs), 9.5 +/- 2.4 ms (by means of F response) and 13.1 +/- 1.5 ms (by means of H response). Of the three methods used the H response method seems to be the best for clinical purposes: it is easy to perform and statistically it is more stable than the F response recording; moreover the recording can be performed reliably even in persons with thick back muscles and subcutaneous fat, unlike the evoked potential procedure which only with difficulty shows detectable responses at the lumbosacral levels in such persons. Three patients are presented to illustrate the technique; in one of these the recording evoked potentials from the epidural space were recorded.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7217956      PMCID: PMC490783          DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.43.12.1103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry        ISSN: 0022-3050            Impact factor:   10.154


  21 in total

1.  Studies on the human evoked electrospinogram. I. The origin of the segmental evoked potentials.

Authors:  C Ertekin
Journal:  Acta Neurol Scand       Date:  1976-01       Impact factor: 3.209

2.  Studies on the human evoked electrospinogram. II. The conduction velocity along the dorsal funiculus.

Authors:  C Ertekin
Journal:  Acta Neurol Scand       Date:  1976-01       Impact factor: 3.209

3.  Spinal evoked response: peripheral nerve stimulation in man.

Authors:  R Q Cracco
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1973-10

4.  Analysis of somatosensory evoked potentials to lateral popliteal nerve stimulation in man.

Authors:  T Tsumoto; N Hirose; S Nonaka; M Takahashi
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1972-10

5.  Epidural recording of spinal electrogram in man.

Authors:  K Shimoji; H Higashi; T Kano
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1971-03

6.  Evoked spinal electrograms recorded from epidural space in man.

Authors:  K Shimoji; T Kano; H Higashi; T Morioka; E O Henschel
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1972-10       Impact factor: 3.531

7.  An experimental study of the F wave in the baboon.

Authors:  J G McLeod; S H Wray
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1966-06       Impact factor: 10.154

8.  F and H responses elicited from muscles of the lower limb in normal subjects.

Authors:  L Fra; F Brignolio
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  1968 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.181

9.  Evoked somatosensory potentials in man.

Authors:  S J Larson; A Sances; P C Christenson
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1966-07

10.  Observations on the nature of the F wave in man.

Authors:  R F Mayer; R G Feldman
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1967-02       Impact factor: 9.910

View more
  2 in total

1.  [Spinal and cerebral somatosensory evoked potentials in single and double stimulation of the tibial nerve].

Authors:  H Gerhard; J Jörg; I Selter; H Jansen
Journal:  Arch Psychiatr Nervenkr (1970)       Date:  1983

2.  Development of the visual white matter pathways mediates development of electrophysiological responses in visual cortex.

Authors:  Sendy Caffarra; Sung Jun Joo; David Bloom; John Kruper; Ariel Rokem; Jason D Yeatman
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2021-09-06       Impact factor: 5.038

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.