Literature DB >> 7214792

A comparison of methods of lidocaine administration in patients.

L B Salzer, A B Weinrib, R J Marina, J J Lima.   

Abstract

A three-step method for administering lidocaine intravenously was developed and tested in 19 patients. Of all plasma concentrations measured, 70% were within the desired range of 2 to 4 micrograms/ml after the new method of lidocaine administration. Compared with other methods it is superior with respect to percent of time in the therapeutic range. No ventricular arrhythmias were evident, and no toxicities were associated with the new method. Infusions of lidocaine for more than 6 hr were associated with progressive increases in plasma concentrations that were higher (p less than 0.01) at 24 hr than at 6 hr.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7214792     DOI: 10.1038/clpt.1981.86

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0009-9236            Impact factor:   6.875


  6 in total

1.  Factors affecting free (unbound) lignocaine concentration in suspected acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  P A Routledge; W W Stargel; A Barchowsky; G S Wagner; D G Shand
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 2.  Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations in drug therapy of cardiac emergencies.

Authors:  P Pentel; N Benowitz
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1984 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Rapid prediction of individual dosage requirements for lignocaine.

Authors:  S Vozeh; M Berger; M Wenk; R Ritz; F Follath
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1984 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 4.  The altered pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drugs commonly used in critically ill patients.

Authors:  A Bodenham; M P Shelly; G R Park
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Effect of lidocaine on in vivo hepatic function.

Authors:  B Mets; R Hickman; U Neveling; M Emms; D O Chalton
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 6.  Comparison of drug dosing methods.

Authors:  M E Burton; M R Vasko; D C Brater
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1985 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.447

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.