Literature DB >> 721397

Abdominal wound disruption following obstetric and gynaecological surgery.

J F Murphy, B Khamis.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 721397     DOI: 10.1007/bf02939438

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ir J Med Sci        ISSN: 0021-1265            Impact factor:   1.568


× No keyword cloud information.
  13 in total

1.  A controlled clinical trial of three methods of closure of laparotomy wounds.

Authors:  J C Goligher; T T Irvin; D Johnston; F T De Dombal; G L Hill; J C Horrocks
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  THE INFLUENCE OF SUTURE MATERIALS AND METHODS ON THE HEALING OF ABDOMINAL WOUNDS.

Authors:  H HAXTON
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1965-05       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  ABDOMINAL WOUND DISRUPTION.

Authors:  G EFRON
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1965-06-19       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Rupture of laparotomy wounds.

Authors:  A STANDEVEN
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1955-03-12       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  The absorption of catgut in human abdominal wounds.

Authors:  H HAXTON
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1963-03       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  The strength of suture knots after one week in vivo.

Authors:  H Tera; C Aberg
Journal:  Acta Chir Scand       Date:  1976

7.  Mass single layer closure of abdominal wounds.

Authors:  J Nayman
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1976-02-14       Impact factor: 7.738

8.  Abdominal wound dehiscence.

Authors:  J Reitamo; C Möller
Journal:  Acta Chir Scand       Date:  1972

9.  Elimination of disruption of abdominal incisions.

Authors:  J W Lord; R B Pfeffer; F M Golomb
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1969-10

10.  The causes of abdominal wound disruption.

Authors:  H C Alexander; J F Prudden
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1966-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.