Literature DB >> 7212800

A multifactorial analysis of melanoma: III. Prognostic factors in melanoma patients with lymph node metastases (stage II).

C M Balch, S J Soong, T M Murad, A L Ingalls, W A Maddox.   

Abstract

Twelve prognostic features of melanoma were examined in a series of 185 patients with nodal metastases (Stage II), who underwent surgical treatment at our institution during the past 20 years. Forty-four per cent of the patients presented with synchronous nodal metastases (substage IIA), 44% of the patients had delayed nodal metastases (substage IIB), and 12% of the patients had nodal metastases from an unknown primary site (substage IIC). The patients with IIB (delayed) metastases had a better overall survival rate than patients with IIA (synchronous) metastases, when calculated from the time of diagnosis. These differences could be explained on the basis of tumor burden at the time of initial diagnosis (microscopic for IIB patients versus macroscopic for IIA patients). Once nodal metastases became evident in IIB patients, their survival rates were the same as for substage IIA patients, when calculated from the onset of nodal metastases. The survival rates for both subgroups was 28% at five years and 15% for ten years. Substage IIC patients (unknown 1 degrees site) had better five-year survival rates (39%), but the sample size was small and the differences were not statistically significant. A multifactorial analysis was used to identify the dominant prognostic variables from among 12 clinical and pathologic parameters. Only two factors were found to independently influence survival rates: 1) the number of metastatic nodes (p = 0.005), and the presence or absence of ulceration (p = 0.0019). Additional factors considered that had either indirect or no influence on survival rates (p > 0.10) were: anatomic location, age, sex, remission duration, substage of disease, tumor thickness, level of invasion, pigmentation, and lymphocyte infiltration. All combinations of nodal metastases were analyzed from survival differences. The combination that showed the greatest differences was one versus two to four versus more than four nodes. Their five-year survival rates were 58%, 27% and 10%, respectively (p < 0.001). Ulceration of the primary cutaneous melanoma was associated with a <15% five-year survival rate, while nonulcerative melanomas had a 30% five-year survival rate (p < 0.001). The combination of ulceration and multiple metastatic nodes had a profound adverse effect on survival rates. While tumor thickness was the most important factor in predicting the risk of nodal metastases in Stage I patients (p < 10(-8)), it had no predictive value on the patient's clinical course once nodal metastases had occurred (p = 0.507). The number of metastatic nodes and the presence of ulceration are important factors to account for when comparing surgical results, and when analyzing the efficacy of adjunctive systemic treatments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7212800      PMCID: PMC1345080          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-198103000-00023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  28 in total

1.  Contemporary treatment of malignant melanoma.

Authors:  B Cady; M A Legg; A B Redfern
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Selection of the optimum surgical treatment of stage I melanoma by depth of microinvasion: Use of the combined microstage technique (Clark-Breslow).

Authors:  H J Wanebo; J G Fortner; J Woodruff; B MacLean; E Binkowski
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Adjuvant immunotherapy with BCG in treatment of regional-lymph-node metastases from malignant melanoma.

Authors:  F R Eilber; D L Morton; E C Holmes; F C Sparks; K P Ramming
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1976-01-29       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Biostatistical basis of elective node dissection for malignant melanoma.

Authors:  J G Fortner; J Woodruff; D Schottenfeld; B Maclean
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Prognostic factors in cutaneous malignant melanoma. A comparative study of long term and short term survivors.

Authors:  A G Huvos; A P Shah; V Miké
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 3.466

6.  Results of regional lymph node dissection for melanoma.

Authors:  S L Gumport; M N Harris
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  The role of groin dissection in the management of melanoma of the lower extremity.

Authors:  J G McCarthy; C D Haagensen; F P Herter
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1974-02       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Prognostic significance of lymph node dissection in the treatment of malignant melanoma.

Authors:  H S Goldsmith; J P Shah; D H Kim
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1970-09       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Prognosis of malignant melanoma according to regional metastases.

Authors:  U Veronesi; N Cascinelli; F Preda
Journal:  Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med       Date:  1971-02

10.  Melanoma of the trunk: the results of surgical excision and anatomic guidelines for predicting nodal metastasis.

Authors:  E V Sugarbaker; C M McBride
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 3.982

View more
  43 in total

1.  A ten-year follow-up on stage II malignant melanoma patients treated postsurgically with Newcastle disease virus oncolysate.

Authors:  W A Cassel; D R Murray
Journal:  Med Oncol Tumor Pharmacother       Date:  1992

Review 2.  Overview and update of the phase III Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trials (MSLT-I and MSLT-II) in melanoma.

Authors:  Donald L Morton
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2012-06-24       Impact factor: 5.150

3.  Pattern and incidence of first site recurrences following sentinel node procedure in melanoma patients.

Authors:  Markwin G Statius Muller; Paul A M van Leeuwen; Paul J van Diest; Rik Pijpers; Robert J Nijveldt; Ronald J C L M Vuylsteke; Sybren Meijer
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2002-09-26       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  The prognosis of melanoma patients with metastases to two or more lymph node areas.

Authors:  R J Barth; D J Venzon; A R Baker
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Operative management of metastatic melanoma in bone may require en bloc resection of disease.

Authors:  Jeffrey E Krygier; Valerae O Lewis; Christopher P Cannon; Robert L Satcher; Bryan S Moon; Patrick P Lin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Effectiveness of positron emission tomography for the detection of melanoma metastases.

Authors:  W D Holder; R L White; J H Zuger; E J Easton; F L Greene
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Clinicopathological Features, Staging, and Current Approaches to Treatment in High-Risk Resectable Melanoma.

Authors:  Emily Z Keung; Jeffrey E Gershenwald
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  A 15-year follow-up of AJCC stage III malignant melanoma patients treated postsurgically with Newcastle disease virus (NDV) oncolysate and determination of alterations in the CD8 T cell repertoire.

Authors:  F M Batliwalla; B A Bateman; D Serrano; D Murray; S Macphail; V C Maino; J C Ansel; P K Gregersen; C A Armstrong
Journal:  Mol Med       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 6.354

9.  Biological factors, tumor growth kinetics, and survival after metastasectomy for pulmonary melanoma.

Authors:  Jonathan H Lee; Seza A Gulec; Ainura Kyshtoobayeva; Myung-Shin Sim; Donald L Morton
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 10.  Potential uses of interferon alpha 2 as adjuvant therapy in cancer.

Authors:  S S Agarwala; J M Kirkwood
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 5.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.