Literature DB >> 7211087

The oral glucose tolerance test: a comparison of the time points on the basis of limit values, normal dispersion, and reproducibility.

D Dix, P Cohen, S Barzegar, M Striefler.   

Abstract

Time points in the glucose tolerance test (GTT) are compared on the basis of limit values, dispersion within a reference population, and reproducibility. We suggest using the distance between a limit value and the median reference value as a measure of the magnitude of abnormality. The distance between 140 mg/100 ml and the median fasting plasma glucose value is chosen as a standard distance and limits for other points in the GTT are calculated to equal this standard distance of abnormality. We suggest that the probability of correctly interpreting an individual result is directly related to the reproducibility of the test and inversely related to the percentage of the total range of values which is dispersed among the normal population. The ratio of reproducibility to percentage normal dispersion is proposed as an index of the probability of correctly interpreting an individual result. According to this index, and probability of correct interpretation varies in order: fasting plasma glucose concentration greater than 3-h greater than 2-h greater than 0.5-h greater than 1-h plasma glucose concentration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7211087     DOI: 10.1007/bf02056102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Diabetol Lat        ISSN: 0001-5563


  8 in total

Review 1.  The glucose tolerance test: a pitfall in the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  M D Siperstein
Journal:  Adv Intern Med       Date:  1975

2.  The precision of percentiles in establishing normal limits in medicine.

Authors:  L HERRERA
Journal:  J Lab Clin Med       Date:  1958-07

3.  Reproducibility of oral glucose tolerance data in normal and mildly diabetic subjects.

Authors:  P E Harding; N W Oakley; V Wynn
Journal:  Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)       Date:  1973-10       Impact factor: 3.478

4.  Influence of statistical method used on the resulting estimate of normal range.

Authors:  A H Reed; R J Henry; W B Mason
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1971-04       Impact factor: 8.327

5.  Bimodality of glycosylated hemoglobin distribution in Pima Indians: relationship to fasting hyperglycemia.

Authors:  E V Flock; P H Bennett; P J Savage; C J Webner; B V Howard; N B Rushforth; M Miller
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 9.461

6.  Glycohemoglobin and glucose tolerance tests compared as indicators of borderline diabetes.

Authors:  D Dix; P Cohen; S Kingsley; J Senkbeil; K Sexton
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 8.327

7.  Hyperglycaemia and diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  R J Jarrett; H Keen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1976-11-06       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Classification and diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and other categories of glucose intolerance. National Diabetes Data Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 9.461

  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  The oral glucose tolerance test: an objective method of interpretation.

Authors:  P Cohen; D Dix
Journal:  Acta Diabetol Lat       Date:  1984 Apr-Jun

2.  Insulin sensitivity index (ISI0, 120) potentially linked to carbon isotopes of breath CO2 for pre-diabetes and type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Chiranjit Ghosh; Prabuddha Mukhopadhyay; Shibendu Ghosh; Manik Pradhan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.